Émilie Du Châtelet on Freedom: The Wolffian Context

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We contextualize Du Châtelet’s On Freedom (c. 1737) within the framework of Christian Wolff’s theory of free will and action. Wolff’s account resulted in a conflict with the German Pietists on whether internal spontaneity is central to free action, in its own right, or whether there needs to be some causal contribution from the will, independent of reason, to the action for that action to be free. Contextualizing Du Châtelet’s account with Wolff’s German Metaphysics (1719) and the ensuing Pietist debate helps to clarify certain puzzling parts of On Freedom; particularly ones that are concerned with the connection of the will to physical action and the issue of whether Du Châtelet supports a more compatibilist or libertarian view of freedom. Regarding the latter, we propose a conciliatory reading due to textual evidence for both compatibilist and libertarian accounts. We argue that Du Châtelet does not commit to a clear compatibilist or libertarian position in On Freedom and merely responds to what she calls the “illustrious opponents” of freedom in the text.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationÉmilie Du Châtelet in Relation to Leibniz and Wolff
Subtitle of host publicationSimilarities and Differences
EditorsClara Carus, Jeffrey McDonough
Place of PublicationSwitzerland
PublisherSpringer
Pages155-176
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-031-80541-7
ISBN (Print)978-3-031-80540-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Publication typeA3 Book chapter

Publication series

NameWomen in the History of Philosophy and Sciences
PublisherSpringer
Volume23

Keywords

  • Du Châtet, Emilie
  • Enlightenment
  • Wolff, Christian
  • free will
  • early modern women philosophers

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Émilie Du Châtelet on Freedom: The Wolffian Context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this