TY - JOUR
T1 - 3D laparoscopic prostatectomy
T2 - results of multicentre study
AU - Haapiainen, Henry
AU - Kaipia, Antti
AU - Murtola, Teemu
AU - Seikkula, Heikki
AU - Seppänen, Marjo
AU - Jämsä, Pyry
AU - Raitanen, Mika
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was financially supported by research funding provided by the Finnish Urological Association, Tampere University Hospital (TAYS) Research, Development and Innovation Centre, The Hospital District of South Ostrobothnia and the Finnish Cultural Foundation. The authors are thankful to Ms Heini Huhtala, Faculty of Social Sciences, Biostatistics Group, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland, for her expert consultation on statistical analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Three-dimensional laparoscopic prostatectomy (3D LRP) is a potentially cost-effective option for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Results for two-dimensional LRP and RALP are well documented; however, little has been published on the outcomes of 3D LRP. Our objective was to report the perioperative and short-term results of 3D LRP in a multicentre study. Materials and methods: In total, 496 unselected men with prostate cancer underwent 3D LRP by three surgeons between December 2013 and December 2018. Median age was 64 (43–76) years. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.9 (0.7–148) ng/ml. Preoperative and perioperative data and complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification were collected. PSA and continence results were reported at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Data were analysed with IBM SPSS statistics (25). Results: Pathological Gleason score was 6 in 29%, 7 in 55.4%, 8 in 9.1%, 9 in 5.2% and 10 in 1.2% of patients. Pathological tumour classification was T2c in 59.5%, T3a in 19.5% and T3b in 10.9% of cases. Positive surgical margins occurred in 27.2%. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 36.3%, with positive lymph nodes in 11.8%. Median operative time was 137 (78–334) min and median blood loss 200 (10–1100) ml. Clavien–Dindo IIIa and IIIb complications occurred in 6.9% and 1.6%, respectively. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, 90.2% and 91.4% of patients, respectively, had PSA <0.2 ng/ml, while 77.1% and 87.7% of patients were completely dry or using a maximum of one pad daily. Conclusions: 3D LRP shows promising results, comparable to similar studies published on RALP.
AB - Introduction: Three-dimensional laparoscopic prostatectomy (3D LRP) is a potentially cost-effective option for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Results for two-dimensional LRP and RALP are well documented; however, little has been published on the outcomes of 3D LRP. Our objective was to report the perioperative and short-term results of 3D LRP in a multicentre study. Materials and methods: In total, 496 unselected men with prostate cancer underwent 3D LRP by three surgeons between December 2013 and December 2018. Median age was 64 (43–76) years. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.9 (0.7–148) ng/ml. Preoperative and perioperative data and complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification were collected. PSA and continence results were reported at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Data were analysed with IBM SPSS statistics (25). Results: Pathological Gleason score was 6 in 29%, 7 in 55.4%, 8 in 9.1%, 9 in 5.2% and 10 in 1.2% of patients. Pathological tumour classification was T2c in 59.5%, T3a in 19.5% and T3b in 10.9% of cases. Positive surgical margins occurred in 27.2%. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 36.3%, with positive lymph nodes in 11.8%. Median operative time was 137 (78–334) min and median blood loss 200 (10–1100) ml. Clavien–Dindo IIIa and IIIb complications occurred in 6.9% and 1.6%, respectively. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, 90.2% and 91.4% of patients, respectively, had PSA <0.2 ng/ml, while 77.1% and 87.7% of patients were completely dry or using a maximum of one pad daily. Conclusions: 3D LRP shows promising results, comparable to similar studies published on RALP.
KW - 3D laparoscopy
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - radical prostatectomy
KW - surgical technique
U2 - 10.1080/21681805.2022.2075458
DO - 10.1080/21681805.2022.2075458
M3 - Article
C2 - 35634887
AN - SCOPUS:85131195501
SN - 2168-1805
VL - 56
SP - 176
EP - 181
JO - SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
JF - SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
IS - 3
ER -
