A retrospective analysis of iv ketamine outcome on hospitalizations in an unselected psychiatric sample

Karl Sandström, Olli Kampman, Peter Asellus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to explore the outcome with iv ketamine treatment in a real-world clinical setting, primarily measured as posttreatment days hospitalized. Methods: The psychiatric medical records of 46 patients having received iv ketamine on a psychiatric treatment indication between 2015-2018 were retrospectively examined. Analysis comparing the number and duration of hospital admissions before and after ketamine treatment as well as logistic regression analysis to investigate clinical predictors of effectiveness, were performed. To assess patients’ severity of depressed symptoms records were screened for MADRS-S scores. Results: No significant difference between pre- and posttreatment hospital days (p=0.170), or number of hospitalizations (p=0.740) were found. The response rate was 31% and remission rate 21%. None of the predictors showed statistical significance in the logistic model. Conclusion: Iv ketamine treatment showed effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms even with complex patients in a real-world clinical setting. However, this did not translate to a reduction in hospitalization. Highlighting the multifaceted challenges posed when implementing iv ketamine treatment in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Antidepressive agents
  • Depressive disorder
  • Depressive disorder, treatmentresistant
  • Ketamine
  • Mood disorders

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A retrospective analysis of iv ketamine outcome on hospitalizations in an unselected psychiatric sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this