Adoption of incentive-based insurance applications: the perspective of psychological ownership

Antti Talonen, Lasse Koskinen, Raimo Voutilainen, Harri Talonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Incentive-based health insurance applications have been implemented to trigger lower insurance premiums when the individual follows healthy living habits. It has been recognised that this benefit notwithstanding, consumers’ perceptions related to such applications in the life-insurance field and health tracking are not necessarily positive. Recent research has recognised that psychological ownership, a mental state wherein one feels a technology or application to be his or her own, plays a crucial role in individuals’ willingness to adopt and use new technologies. It has been suggested that many digital applications and platforms possess unique empowering and co-creative features that offer special potential to facilitate the emergence of psychological ownership and satisfy the underlying needs. The aim of our study, proceeding from these premises, was to identify and thematize hurdles to take-up of incentive-based health insurance applications with regard to meeting needs that drive development of psychological ownership. We achieved this by conducting a thematic analysis of perceptions of consumers who were not willing to adopt a specific application of the relevant type. The resulting framework, which recognises 14 thematized hurdles in all, holds important implications for scientific and managerial use both.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)794-806
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Financial Services Marketing
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date12 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adoption of incentive-based insurance applications: the perspective of psychological ownership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this