Analysis of Crowdsensed WiFi Fingerprints for Indoor Localization

Zhe Peng, Philipp Richter, Helena Leppäkoski, Elena-Simona Lohan

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    256 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Crowdsensing is more and more used nowadays for indoor localization based on Received Signal Strength (RSS) fingerprinting. It is a fast and efficient solution to maintain fingerprinting databases and to keep them up-to-date. There are however several challenges involved in crowdsensing RSS fingerprinting data, and these have been little investigated so far in the current literature. Our goal is to analyse the impact of various error sources in the crowdsensing process for the purpose of indoor localization. We rely our findings on a heavy measurement campaign involving 21 measurement devices and more than 6800 fingerprints. We show that crowdsensed databases are more robust to erroneous RSS reports than to malicious fingerprint position reports. We also evaluate the positioning accuracy achievable with crowdsensed databases in the absence of any available calibration.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 21st Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
    Place of PublicationHelsinki, Finland
    PublisherFRUCT
    Pages268-277
    Number of pages10
    ISBN (Electronic)978-952-68653-2-4
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017
    Publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    EventProceedings of Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT -
    Duration: 1 Jan 2000 → …

    Publication series

    Name
    ISSN (Electronic)2305-7254

    Conference

    ConferenceProceedings of Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
    Period1/01/00 → …

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 0

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of Crowdsensed WiFi Fingerprints for Indoor Localization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this