TY - JOUR
T1 - Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for a degenerative meniscus tear
T2 - A 5 year follow-up of the placebo-surgery controlled FIDELITY (Finnish Degenerative Meniscus Lesion Study) trial
AU - Sihvonen, Raine
AU - Paavola, Mika
AU - Malmivaara, Antti
AU - Itälä, Ari
AU - Joukainen, Antti
AU - Kalske, Juha
AU - Nurmi, Heikki
AU - Kumm, Jaanika
AU - Sillanpää, Niko
AU - Kiekara, Tommi
AU - Turkiewicz, Aleksandra
AU - Toivonen, Pirjo
AU - Englund, Martin
AU - Taimela, Simo
AU - Järvinen, Teppo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/28
Y1 - 2020/10/28
N2 - Objectives: To assess the long-term effects of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) on the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis, and on knee symptoms and function, at 5 years follow-up. Design: Multicentre, randomised, participant- A nd outcome assessor-blinded, placebo-surgery controlled trial. Setting: Orthopaedic departments in five public hospitals in Finland. Participants: 146 adults, mean age 52 years (range 35-65 years), with knee symptoms consistent with degenerative medial meniscus tear verified by MRI scan and arthroscopically, and no clinical signs of knee osteoarthritis were randomised. Interventions: APM or placebo surgery (diagnostic knee arthroscopy). Main outcome measures: We used two indices of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (increase in Kellgren and Lawrence grade ≥1, and increase in Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas radiographic joint space narrowing and osteophyte sum score, respectively), and three validated patient-relevant measures of knee symptoms and function (Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), Lysholm, and knee pain after exercise using a numerical rating scale). Results: There was a consistent, slightly greater risk for progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis in the APM group as compared with the placebo surgery group (adjusted absolute risk difference in increase in Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥1 of 13%, 95% CI-2% to 28%; adjusted absolute mean difference in OARSI sum score 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.3). There were no relevant between-group differences in the three patient-reported outcomes: Adjusted absolute mean differences (APM vs placebo surgery),-1.7 (95% CI-7.7 to 4.3) in WOMET,-2.1 (95% CI-6.8 to 2.6) in Lysholm knee score, and-0.04 (95% CI-0.81 to 0.72) in knee pain after exercise, respectively. The corresponding adjusted absolute risk difference in the presence of mechanical symptoms was 18% (95% CI 5% to 31%); there were more symptoms reported in the APM group. All other secondary outcomes comparisons were similar. Conclusions: APM was associated with a slightly increased risk of developing radiographic knee osteoarthritis and no concomitant benefit in patient-relevant outcomes, at 5 years after surgery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01052233 and NCT00549172).
AB - Objectives: To assess the long-term effects of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) on the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis, and on knee symptoms and function, at 5 years follow-up. Design: Multicentre, randomised, participant- A nd outcome assessor-blinded, placebo-surgery controlled trial. Setting: Orthopaedic departments in five public hospitals in Finland. Participants: 146 adults, mean age 52 years (range 35-65 years), with knee symptoms consistent with degenerative medial meniscus tear verified by MRI scan and arthroscopically, and no clinical signs of knee osteoarthritis were randomised. Interventions: APM or placebo surgery (diagnostic knee arthroscopy). Main outcome measures: We used two indices of radiographic knee osteoarthritis (increase in Kellgren and Lawrence grade ≥1, and increase in Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas radiographic joint space narrowing and osteophyte sum score, respectively), and three validated patient-relevant measures of knee symptoms and function (Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), Lysholm, and knee pain after exercise using a numerical rating scale). Results: There was a consistent, slightly greater risk for progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis in the APM group as compared with the placebo surgery group (adjusted absolute risk difference in increase in Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥1 of 13%, 95% CI-2% to 28%; adjusted absolute mean difference in OARSI sum score 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.3). There were no relevant between-group differences in the three patient-reported outcomes: Adjusted absolute mean differences (APM vs placebo surgery),-1.7 (95% CI-7.7 to 4.3) in WOMET,-2.1 (95% CI-6.8 to 2.6) in Lysholm knee score, and-0.04 (95% CI-0.81 to 0.72) in knee pain after exercise, respectively. The corresponding adjusted absolute risk difference in the presence of mechanical symptoms was 18% (95% CI 5% to 31%); there were more symptoms reported in the APM group. All other secondary outcomes comparisons were similar. Conclusions: APM was associated with a slightly increased risk of developing radiographic knee osteoarthritis and no concomitant benefit in patient-relevant outcomes, at 5 years after surgery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01052233 and NCT00549172).
KW - meniscus
KW - osteoarthritis
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102813
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102813
M3 - Article
C2 - 32855201
AN - SCOPUS:85092631092
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 54
SP - 1332
EP - 1339
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 22
ER -