Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bio-electrochemical conversion of industrial wastewater-COD combined with downstream methanol synthesis-an economic and life cycle assessment

  • J. Streeck
  • , C. Hank
  • , M. Neuner
  • , L. Gil-Carrera
  • , M. Kokko
  • , S. Pauliuk
  • , A. Schaadt
  • , S. Kerzenmacher
  • , R. J. White*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Herein, a techno-economic and environmental performance evaluation (i.e. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)) of a 45 kW Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) system is presented in the context of industrial wastewater remediation. This system produces H2 and CO2-suitable for downstream CH3OH synthesis-based on the bio-electrochemical conversion of chemical industry wastewater with an organic content of 3.9 g(COD) L-1. A cost-benefit analysis indicates that the MEC system hardware costs, share of CO2 captured from the MEC and MEC operating current density (i.e. 1.0 mA cm-2) are crucial parameters influencing the total cost and represent areas for potential cost reductions. It was established based on the present study that MEC system operation with renewable electricity leads to H2 production costs of 4-5.7€ kg(H2)-1 (comparable to H2O electrolysis) and CH3OH production costs of 900€ t(CH3OH)-1. At the current CH3OH market prices, however, the production is currently not profitable. In turn, the cost-efficient construction of the MEC system and the use of less expensive materials could lead to improved CH3OH production economics based on this route. Our results indicate that the use of low-cost materials has greater potential with regard to cost reduction compared to reducing the internal resistance and polarization losses via the use of expensive high-performance materials in MEC construction. A complementary LCA of the proposed system, based on a "cradle-to-gate" definition, indicates that waste-based is superior to fossil-based CH3OH production with respect to global warming potential and cumulated fossil energy demand, provided the system is operated with 100% renewable electricity and CO2 sourced only from the MEC. However, with regard to the impact categories Metal Depletion and Freshwater Eutrophication Potential, the system was found to perform less satisfactorily (i.e. in comparison with fossil-based CH3OH production).

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2742-2762
    Number of pages21
    JournalGreen Chemistry
    Volume20
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018
    Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Funding

    The BioMethanol project team would like to thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for financial support through the programme “Future-oriented Technologies and Concepts for an Energy-efficient and Resource-saving Water Management - ERWAS” (Grant No. 02WER1314). The BioMethanol project team would also like to thank M. Hacker (AZV Staufener Bucht, Bad Krozingen, Germany) and S. Estelmann (DLR, Stuttgart, Germany) for helpful discussions and support. RJW would also like to thank the Fraunhofer Society and Fraunhofer ISE for financial support through a “Fraunhofer Attract” award.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
      SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 2

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Chemistry
    • Pollution

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bio-electrochemical conversion of industrial wastewater-COD combined with downstream methanol synthesis-an economic and life cycle assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this