Blood culture practices and microbiological capacity for sepsis diagnostics in Europe (2021–2022): a cross-sectional analysis of the European Sepsis Care Survey

  • Christian S. Scheer*
  • , Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis
  • , Djillali Annane
  • , Antonio Artigas
  • , Abdullah Tarik Aslan
  • , Gabriella Bottari
  • , Hjalmar R. Bouma
  • , Vladimir Černý
  • , Renata Curić Radivojević
  • , Ken Dewitte
  • , Daniela Filipescu
  • , Matthias Gründling
  • , Johanna Hästbacka
  • , Said Laribi
  • , Annmarie Lassen
  • , Konstantin Lebedinskii
  • , Adam Linder
  • , Jan Máca
  • , Manu L.N.G. Malbrain
  • , Gianpaola Monti
  • Marlies Ostermann, Michael Osthoff, José Artur Paiva, Michela Sabbatucci, Jakub Śmiechowicz, Mihai Gabriel Ştefan, Marcus Vollmer, Natalija Vuković, Kyriakos Zaragkoulias, Konrad Reinhart, Ricard Ferrer, Evgeny A. Idelevich
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Blood cultures (BCs) are key diagnostic elements for sepsis patients. Accurate preanalytical procedures are substantial, and results should be available as soon as possible to guide adequate antimicrobial treatment. This study aimed to evaluate BC collection practices and diagnostic capacity across European hospitals. Methods: This cross-sectional survey investigated BC diagnostics in acute care hospitals across 37 European countries in the years 2021 and 2022. Analyses included BC guidelines, collection sites, number of BC sets in emergency departments (EDs), wards, and intensive care units (ICUs). We also examined transfer after collection, the use of on-site vs. external laboratories, opening hours, rapid testing capacity, and turn-around times of BCs processed in microbiology laboratories with different infrastructures. Findings: Responses were collected from 907 hospitals in Europe. BC guidelines were available in 84·4% (741/878) of the hospitals. BCs were preferably collected by multiple-site sampling in EDs (62·7%, 461/735), in wards (64·0%, 513/802) and ICUs (68·5%, 518/756). One BC set was preferred in EDs in 38·4% (270/704), in wards in 40·5% (314/775), and ICUs in 34·9% (261/748). Two BC sets were preferred in EDs in 31·0% (218/704), in wards in 28·1% (218/775), and ICUs in 39·2% (293/748). 48·0% (402/838) of hospitals used on-site and 52·0% (436/838) external microbiology laboratories. Around-the-clock microbiological services were available in 10⋅0% (91/907), and rapid pathogen identification in 43·7% (396/907) of hospitals. Infrastructure with around-the-clock microbiological service and rapid testing was available in 7·4% (62/840) of hospitals, and probability of a final microbiological result within two days was highest in these hospitals compared to hospitals with limited microbiology service (for BC collected on wards: 19·6% vs. 52·7%, Odds Ratio 4·59 [95% CI 2·50–7·79], p < 0·0001). Interpretation: Despite the availability of BC guidelines in many hospitals, current recommendations for BC collection were often neglected. Rapid testing capacity was limited in most microbiological laboratories, and around-the-clock service for BCs was very rare. As delay in results may have a detrimental impact on patient outcomes, strategies to improve these processes are urgently needed. Funding: The European Sepsis Alliance and a grant by Becton and Dickinson.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101570
Number of pages15
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Volume62
Early online dateDec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Dec 2025
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Blood culture analysis
  • Blood cultures
  • Clinical practice
  • Diagnostics
  • Infrastructure
  • Multiple-site sampling
  • Number of blood cultures sets
  • Opening hours
  • Pre-analytical practice
  • Rapid testing
  • Sepsis
  • Single-site sampling
  • Turn-around time

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blood culture practices and microbiological capacity for sepsis diagnostics in Europe (2021–2022): a cross-sectional analysis of the European Sepsis Care Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this