Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

BODY-Q Normative Scores: Psychometric Validation of the BODY-Q in the General Population in Europe and North America

  • Farima Dalaei*
  • , Claire E.E. De Vries
  • , Stefan J. Cano
  • , Manraj N. Kaur
  • , Lotte Poulsen
  • , André Pfob
  • , Danny Mou
  • , Jussi P. Repo
  • , Rosa Salzillo
  • , Jakub Opyrchal
  • , Jens A. Sørensen
  • , Andrea L. Pusic
  • , Anne F. Klassen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: BODY-Q is a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure designed to measure outcomes of weight loss and body contouring patients. To allow interpretation and comparison of BODY-Q scores across studies, normative BODY-Q values were generated from the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of BODY-Q in the normative population. Methods: Data were collected using two crowdsourcing platforms (Prolific and Amazon Mechanical Turk) in 12 European and North American countries. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) was used to examine reliability and validity of BODY-Q scales. Results: RMT analysis supported the psychometric properties of BODY-Q in the normative sample with ordered thresholds in all items and nonsignificant chi-square values for 167 of 176 items. Reliability was high with person separation index of greater than or equal to 0.70 in 20 of 22 scales and Cronbach alpha values of greater than or equal to 0.90 in 17 of 22 scales. Mean scale scores measuring appearance, health-related quality of life, and eating-related concerns scales varied as predicted across subgroups with higher scores reported by participants who were more satisfied with their weight. Analysis to explore differential item functioning by sample (normative versus field-Test) flagged some potential issues, but subsequent comparison of adjusted and unadjusted person estimates provided evidence that the scoring algorithm worked equivalently for the normative sample as in the field-Test samples. Conclusions: The BODY-Q scales showed acceptable reliability and validity in the normative sample. The normative values can be used as reference in research and clinical practice in combination with local estimates for parallel analysis and comparison.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberE5401
Number of pages9
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

The BODY-Q is co-developed by Anne F. Klassen, Stefan J. Cano, and Andrea L. Pusic, and they receive a share of any license revenues based on their institution’s inventor sharing policy. Anne F. Klassen is an owner of EVENTUM Research, which provides consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry. Stefan J. Cano is CSO of Modus Outcomes, a Division of Thread. Manraj Kaur is a recipient of the Canadian Institute of Health Research Fellowship Award (2020–23). All the other authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. This study was funded by research grants from Odense University Hospital (A5006), the Region of Southern Denmark (21/17592), and the Jascha Fund (2021-0183).

FundersFunder number
Jascha Fund2021-0183
Canadian Institutes of Health Research2020–23
Odense UniversitetshospitalA5006
Region Syddanmark21/17592

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'BODY-Q Normative Scores: Psychometric Validation of the BODY-Q in the General Population in Europe and North America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this