Calcium supplementation during pregnancy and long‐term offspring outcome: a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)


The World Health Organization currently recommends calcium supplementation for pregnant women, especially those with low calcium intakes, to reduce the risk of hypertension and preeclampsia. We aimed to evaluate the effect of this intervention on selected offspring outcomes. A systematic search was conducted in 11 databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of maternal calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D during pregnancy on selected offspring cardiovascular, growth, and metabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Screening of titles and abstracts of 3555 records and full texts of 31 records yielded six RCTs (nine reports, n = 1616). Forest plot analyses were performed if at least two studies presented comparable data on the same outcome. In one study (n = 591), high-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk of offspring high systolic blood pressure at 5–7 years of age (risk ratio = 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.39–0.90). The effects of the intervention on offspring growth, metabolic, and neurodevelopmental outcomes remain unknown because of conflicting or insufficient data. High risk of attrition bias decreased the quality of the evidence. Limited available data from RCTs do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that prenatal calcium supplementation influences offspring health outcomes beyond the newborn period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-51
Number of pages16
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1


Dive into the research topics of 'Calcium supplementation during pregnancy and long‐term offspring outcome: a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this