TY - JOUR
T1 - Childhood family environment predicting psychotic disorders over a 37-year follow-up
T2 - A general population cohort study
AU - Saarinen, Aino
AU - Keltikangas-Järvinen, Liisa
AU - Dobewall, Henrik
AU - Sormunen, Elina
AU - Lehtimäki, Terho
AU - Kähönen, Mika
AU - Raitakari, Olli
AU - Hietala, Jarmo
N1 - Funding Information:
The Young Finns Study has been financially supported by the Academy of Finland : grants 322098 , 286284 , 134309 (Eye), 126925 , 121584 , 124282 , 255381 , 256474 , 283115 , 319060 , 320297 , 314389 , 338395 , 330809 , and 104821 , 129378 (Salve), 117797 (Gendi), and 141071 (Skidi); the Social Insurance Institution of Finland ; Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Kuopio, Tampere and Turku University Hospitals (grant X51001 ); Juho Vainio Foundation ; Paavo Nurmi Foundation ; Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research ; Finnish Cultural Foundation ; The Sigrid Juselius Foundation ; Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation ; Emil Aaltonen Foundation ; Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation ; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation ; Diabetes Research Foundation of Finnish Diabetes Association ; EU Horizon 2020 (grant 755320 for TAXINOMISIS and grant 848146 for To Aition); European Research Council (grant 742927 for MULTIEPIGEN project); Tampere University Hospital Supporting Foundation , Finnish Society of Clinical Chemistry and the Cancer Foundation Finland .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Background: Childhood adverse effects and traumatic experiences increase the risk for several psychiatric disorders. We now investigated whether prospectively assessed childhood family environment per se contributes to increased risk for psychotic disorders in adulthood, and whether these family patterns are also relevant in the development of affective disorders. Methods: We used the Young Finns Data (n = 3502). Childhood family environment was assessed in 1980/1983 with previously constructed risk scores: (1) disadvantageous emotional family atmosphere (parenting practices, parents' life satisfaction, parents' mental disorder, parents' alcohol intoxication), (2) adverse socioeconomic environment (overcrowded apartment, home income, parent's employment, occupational status, educational level), and (3) stress-prone life events (home movement, school change, parental divorce, death, or hospitalization, and child's hospitalization). Psychiatric diagnoses (ICD-10 classification) over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the national registry of hospital care. Non-affective psychotic disorder and affective disorder groups were formed. Results: Frequent stress-prone life events predicted higher likelihood of non-affective psychotic disorders (OR = 2.401, p = 0.001). Adverse socioeconomic environment or emotional family atmosphere did not predict psychotic disorders. Only disadvantageous emotional family atmosphere predicted modestly higher likelihood of affective disorders (OR = 1.583, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Our results suggest that childhood family environment and atmosphere patterns as such contribute to the risk for developing adulthood mental disorders with relative disorder specificity. The results emphasize the importance of both individual and public health preventive initiatives, including family support interventions.
AB - Background: Childhood adverse effects and traumatic experiences increase the risk for several psychiatric disorders. We now investigated whether prospectively assessed childhood family environment per se contributes to increased risk for psychotic disorders in adulthood, and whether these family patterns are also relevant in the development of affective disorders. Methods: We used the Young Finns Data (n = 3502). Childhood family environment was assessed in 1980/1983 with previously constructed risk scores: (1) disadvantageous emotional family atmosphere (parenting practices, parents' life satisfaction, parents' mental disorder, parents' alcohol intoxication), (2) adverse socioeconomic environment (overcrowded apartment, home income, parent's employment, occupational status, educational level), and (3) stress-prone life events (home movement, school change, parental divorce, death, or hospitalization, and child's hospitalization). Psychiatric diagnoses (ICD-10 classification) over the lifespan were collected up to 2017 from the national registry of hospital care. Non-affective psychotic disorder and affective disorder groups were formed. Results: Frequent stress-prone life events predicted higher likelihood of non-affective psychotic disorders (OR = 2.401, p = 0.001). Adverse socioeconomic environment or emotional family atmosphere did not predict psychotic disorders. Only disadvantageous emotional family atmosphere predicted modestly higher likelihood of affective disorders (OR = 1.583, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Our results suggest that childhood family environment and atmosphere patterns as such contribute to the risk for developing adulthood mental disorders with relative disorder specificity. The results emphasize the importance of both individual and public health preventive initiatives, including family support interventions.
KW - Affective
KW - Longitudinal
KW - Prospective
KW - Psychiatric disorder
KW - Psychosis
U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2023.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2023.06.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 37392583
AN - SCOPUS:85163977295
SN - 0920-9964
VL - 258
SP - 9
EP - 17
JO - SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
JF - SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
ER -