TY - JOUR
T1 - Consistent pressure ulcer prevention practice
T2 - The effect on PU prevalence and PU stages, and impact on PU prevention—A quasi-experimental intervention study
AU - Mäki-Turja-Rostedt, Sirpa
AU - Leino-Kilpi, Helena
AU - Koivunen, Marita
AU - Vahlberg, Tero
AU - Haavisto, Elina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This study evaluates the effect of nursing staff's renewed consistent pressure ulcer (PU) prevention practice on PU prevalence and the PU prevention implemented for residents. A quasi-experimental intervention study was conducted. The data were collected from 232 residents (n = 115 in intervention and 117 in comparison group) in two public long-term older people care (LOPC) facilities in Finland using the Pressure Ulcer Patient instrument (PUP-Instrument). The facilities were chosen with convenience sampling, after which they were randomly allocated as either intervention or comparison facility. Based on international guidelines for PU prevention, the renewed, consistent PU prevention practice with six areas was developed and implemented using the operational model for evidence-based practices (OMEBP). After the intervention, a significant difference between the intervention and the comparison facility was seen in the prevalence of PUs and in the residents’ highest stage of PUs in the sacrum, buttock and hip areas, and heels. Between the facilities, a significant difference was seen in the use of PU and nutrition risk assessment instruments and nutritional supplements, time used for repositioning in the daytime and at night-time, lifting belt use, and avoiding shearing or stretching residents’ skin. The successful intervention improved skin integrity in LOPC facilities.
AB - This study evaluates the effect of nursing staff's renewed consistent pressure ulcer (PU) prevention practice on PU prevalence and the PU prevention implemented for residents. A quasi-experimental intervention study was conducted. The data were collected from 232 residents (n = 115 in intervention and 117 in comparison group) in two public long-term older people care (LOPC) facilities in Finland using the Pressure Ulcer Patient instrument (PUP-Instrument). The facilities were chosen with convenience sampling, after which they were randomly allocated as either intervention or comparison facility. Based on international guidelines for PU prevention, the renewed, consistent PU prevention practice with six areas was developed and implemented using the operational model for evidence-based practices (OMEBP). After the intervention, a significant difference between the intervention and the comparison facility was seen in the prevalence of PUs and in the residents’ highest stage of PUs in the sacrum, buttock and hip areas, and heels. Between the facilities, a significant difference was seen in the use of PU and nutrition risk assessment instruments and nutritional supplements, time used for repositioning in the daytime and at night-time, lifting belt use, and avoiding shearing or stretching residents’ skin. The successful intervention improved skin integrity in LOPC facilities.
KW - evidence-based practice
KW - intervention
KW - long-term care
KW - pressure ulcer
KW - prevention
U2 - 10.1111/iwj.14067
DO - 10.1111/iwj.14067
M3 - Article
C2 - 36584884
AN - SCOPUS:85145289435
SN - 1742-4801
JO - INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
JF - INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
ER -