Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ): Evidence from 19 countries

Sergio A. Useche, Francisco Alonso, Aleksey Boyko, Polina Buyvol, Isaac Castañeda, Boris Cendales, Arturo Cervantes, Tomas Echiburu, Mireia Faus, Zuleide Feitosa, Javier Gene, Adela Gonzalez-Marin, Victor Gonzalez, Jozef Gnap, Mohd K. Ibrahim, Kira H. Janstrup, Arash Javadinejad, Irijna Makarova, Rich McIlroy, Miroslava MikusovaMette Møller, Sylvain Ngueuteu-Fouaka, Steve O'Hern, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Ksenia Shubenkova, Felix Siebert, Jose Soto, Amanda N. Stephens, Raquel Valle-Escolano, Yonggang Wang, Ellias Willberg, Phillip Wintersberger, Linus Zeuwts, Zarir H. Zulkipli, Luis Montoro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Given different advances in applied literature, risky and positive behaviours keep gaining ground as key contributors for riding safety outcomes. In this regard, the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire (CBQ) represents one of the tools available to assess the core dimensions of cycling behaviour and their relationship with road safety outcomes from a behavioural perspective. Nevertheless, it has never been psychometrically approached through a cross-cultural perspective. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cross-cultural validation of the CBQ, examining its psychometric properties, reliability indexes, validity insights and descriptive scores in 19 countries distributed across five regions: Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. For this purpose, it was used the data retrieved from a full sample of 7,001 urban cyclists responding to a large-scale electronic survey. Participants had a mean age of M = 36.15 (SD = 14.71), ranging between 16 and 83 years. The results of this large-scale study empirically support the assumption that the 29-item version of the CBQ has a fair dimensional structure and item composition, good internal consistency, reliability indexes, and an interesting set of validity insights. Among these results, there can be highlighted that: (i) Structurally speaking, the questionnaire works better under a three-factor dimensionality, keeping all its 29 items, whose factor loadings are >0.400 in all cases; (ii) The CBQ shows greater reliability indexes than in previous applications using smaller samples, with good Cronbach's alphas [0.768 - 0.915], McDonald's omegas [0.770 - 0.913] and Composite Reliability Indexes [981 - 0.994]; and (iii) Robust tests comparing riding behaviours of riders with different levels of risk perception and crash involvement support the concurrent validity of the Cycling Behaviour Questionnaire. These outcomes endorse the usefulness of the CBQ to assess both risky and positive riding behaviours of cyclists in different countries, contributing to assess and improve cycling safety from the human factors approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)386-400
Number of pages15
JournalTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F: TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR
Volume91
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Behavioural questionnaires
  • CBQ
  • Cycling safety
  • Regions
  • Riding behaviour
  • Urban cycling

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Transportation
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ): Evidence from 19 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this