Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

EFAS Score - Multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)

  • Martinus Richter
  • , Per-Henrik Agren
  • , Jean-Luc Besse
  • , Maria Cöster
  • , Hakon Kofoed
  • , Nicola Maffulli
  • , Dieter Rosenbaum
  • , Martijn Steultjens
  • , Fernando Alvarez
  • , Andrzej Boszczyk
  • , Kris Buedts
  • , Marco Guelfi
  • , Henryk Liszka
  • , Jan-Willem Louwerens
  • , Jussi P Repo
  • , Elena Samaila
  • , Michael Stephens
  • , Angelique G H Witteveen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A scientifically sound validated foot and ankle specific score validated ab initio for different languages is missing. The aim of a project of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) was to develop, validate, and publish a new score(the EFAS-Score) for different European languages.

METHODS: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: (1) item (question) identification, (2) item reduction and scale exploration, (3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness. The following score specifications were chosen: scale/subscale (Likert 0-4), questionnaire based, outcome measure, patient related outcome measurement. For stage 3, data were collected pre-operatively and at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using analyses from classical test theory and item response theory.

RESULTS: Stage 1 resulted in 31 general and 7 sports related questions. In stage 2, a 6-item general EFAS Score was constructed using English, German, French and Swedish language data. In stage 3, internal consistency of the scale was confirmed in seven languages: the original four languages, plus Dutch, Italian and Polish (Cronbach's Alpha >0.86 in all language versions). Responsiveness was good, with moderate to large effect sizes in all languages, and significant positive association between the EFAS Score and patient-reported improvement. No sound EFAS Sports Score could be constructed.

CONCLUSIONS: The multi-language EFAS Score was successfully validated in the orthopaedic ankle and foot surgery patient population, including a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.co.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-204
Number of pages20
JournalFoot and Ankle Surgery
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Foot Diseases/diagnosis
  • Foot Joints/surgery
  • Humans
  • Language
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Orthopedic Procedures
  • Orthopedics
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Societies, Medical
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'EFAS Score - Multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this