Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy eating and daily physical activity

  • Eeva Rantala*
  • , Saara Vanhatalo
  • , Mikko Valtanen
  • , Jaana Lindström
  • , Jussi Pihlajamäki
  • , Kaisa Poutanen
  • , Pilvikki Absetz
  • , Leila Karhunen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Modifying the choice architecture of behavioural contexts can facilitate health behaviour change, but existing evidence builds mostly on small-scale interventions limited in duration, targets, strategies, and settings. We evaluated the effectiveness of a one-year hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness trial aimed at promoting healthy eating and daily physical activity with subtle modifications to the choice architecture of heterogeneous worksites. The intervention was contextualised to and integrated into the routine operations of each worksite. Effectiveness was evaluated in a quasi-experimental pre-post design. Methods: Intervention sites (n = 21) implemented a median of two (range 1–9) intervention strategies for healthy eating and one (range 1–5) for physical activity. Questionnaires pre (n = 1126) and post (n = 943) intervention surveyed employees’ behavioural patterns at work (food consumption: vegetables/roots, fruit/berries, nuts/almonds/seeds, sweet treats, fast food, water; physical activity: restorative movement, exercise equipment use, stair use). The post-intervention questionnaire also measured employees’ perception of and response to three intervention strategies: a packed lunch recipe campaign, a fruit crew-strategy, and movement prompts. Multi- and single-level regression models evaluated effectiveness, treating intervention as a continuous predictor formed of the site-specific dose (n intervention strategies employed) and mean quality (three-point rating per strategy halfway and at the end of the intervention) of implementation relevant to each outcome. Results: Multinomial logistic regression models found the intervention significantly associated with a favourable change in employees’ fruit and berry consumption (interaction effect of time and implementation p = 0.006) and with an unfavourable change in sweet treat consumption (p = 0.048). The evidence was strongest for the finding concerning fruit/berry consumption—an outcome that sites with greater dose and quality of implementation targeted by using strategies that reduced the physical effort required to have fruit/berries at work and by covering multiple eating-related contexts at the worksite. The quality of implementation was positively associated with the perception of (p = 0.044) and response to (p = 0.017) the packed lunch recipes, and with response to the fruit crew-strategy (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results suggest that a contextualised, multicomponent choice architecture intervention can positively influence eating behaviour in diverse real-world settings over a one-year period, and that higher implementation quality can enhance intervention perception and response. However, outcomes may depend on the type of intervention strategies used and the extent of their delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number939
Number of pages15
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge all participating worksites and their representatives for collaboration; Tanja Tilles-Tirkkonen, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Markus Kanerva, Laurea University of Applied Sciences, and Marjukka Kolehmainen, UEF, for contribution to the identification and recruitment of worksites and to intervention design; and Laura Karhu, UEF, for contribution to intervention implementation and data collection. This work has received funding from the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland (grant number: 303537), the North Savo Regional fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation (65221698), the Diabetes Research Foundation (220016), and the Research Council of Finland (332466). The funders had no role in the conceptualisation or design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

FundersFunder number
Itä-Suomen yliopisto
Laurea University of Applied Sciences
Finnish Strategic Research Council
Strategic Research Council at the Research Council of Finland303537, 332466
North Savo Regional fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation65221698
Fondazione Diabete Ricerca220016

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Behaviour change
    • Choice architecture
    • Diet
    • Health promotion
    • Nudge
    • Physical activity
    • Prevention
    • Type 2 diabetes
    • Workplace

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of workplace choice architecture modification for healthy eating and daily physical activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this