TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of physical and cognitive training on gait speed and cognition in older adults
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Sipilä, Sarianna
AU - Tirkkonen, Anna
AU - Savikangas, Tiina
AU - Hänninen, Tuomo
AU - Laukkanen, Pia
AU - Alen, Markku
AU - Fielding, Roger A.
AU - Kivipelto, Miia
AU - Kulmala, Jenni
AU - Rantanen, Taina
AU - Sihvonen, Sanna E.
AU - Sillanpää, Elina
AU - Stigsdotter Neely, Anna
AU - Törmäkangas, Timo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland Grant no: 296843 covering the costs of data collection, management, analysis, and writing the reports. Professor Sipil? was also supported by funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement (No 675003). Dr. Fielding's contribution to this work was also supported by the Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (1P30AG031679) and by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement No. 58-1950-4-003. Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Professor Kivipelto's contribution to this work was also supported by the Stiftelse Stocholms Sjukhem; Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; Joint Program of Neurodegenerative Disorders?prevention (MIND-AD) grant; Center for Innovative Medicine (CIMED) at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. Professor Rantanen's contribution to this work was also supported by the European Research Council (grant agreement No 310526) and the Academy of Finland (Grant No 693045). The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the publication lies entirely with the authors. Dr. T?rm?kangas's contribution to this work was supported by an Academy of Finland Postdoctoral Researcher grant (Grant no: 286536). Authors like to thank Emmi Matikainen (PT, MSc, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyv?skyl?, Finland), Noora Sartela (MSc, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyv?skyl?, Finland), Hanna Anttilainen (PT, MSc, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyv?skyl?, Finland), and Elina Vettenter? (PT, MSc, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyv?skyl?, Finland) for their contribution in drafting the physical training intervention and supervising the training sessions. We also like to thank Mr. Tony Qwillbard, Department of Educational Science, Ume? University, for programming the iPASS software. Everyone who contributed significantly to the work has been acknowledged in this section.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Gait speed is a measure of health and functioning. Physical and cognitive determinants of gait are amenable to interventions, but best practices remain unclear. We investigated the effects of a 12-month physical and cognitive training (PTCT) on gait speed, dual-task cost in gait speed, and executive functions (EFs) compared with physical training (PT) (ISRCTN52388040). Community-dwelling older adults, who did not meet physical activity recommendations, were recruited (n = 314). PT included supervised walking/balance (once weekly) and resistance/balance training (once weekly), home exercises (2–3 times weekly), and moderate aerobic activity 150 min/week in bouts of >10 min. PTCT included the PT and computer training (CT) on EFs 15–20 min, 3–4 times weekly. The primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were 6-min walking distance, dual-task cost in gait speed, and EF (Stroop and Trail Making B-A). The trial was completed by 93% of the participants (age 74.5 [SD3.8] years; 60% women). Mean adherence to supervised sessions was 59%–72% in PT and 62%–77% in PTCT. Home exercises and CT were performed on average 1.9 times/week. Weekly minutes spent in aerobic activities were 188 (median 169) in PT and 207 (median 180) in PTCT. No significant interactions were observed for gait speed (PTCT-PT, 0.02; 95%CI −0.03, 0.08), walking distance (−3.8; −16.9, 9.3) or dual-task cost (−0.22; −1.74, 1.30). Stroop improvement was greater after PTCT than PT (−6.9; −13.0, −0.8). Complementing physical training with EFs training is not essential for promotion of gait speed. For EF’s, complementing physical training with targeted cognitive training provides additional benefit.
AB - Gait speed is a measure of health and functioning. Physical and cognitive determinants of gait are amenable to interventions, but best practices remain unclear. We investigated the effects of a 12-month physical and cognitive training (PTCT) on gait speed, dual-task cost in gait speed, and executive functions (EFs) compared with physical training (PT) (ISRCTN52388040). Community-dwelling older adults, who did not meet physical activity recommendations, were recruited (n = 314). PT included supervised walking/balance (once weekly) and resistance/balance training (once weekly), home exercises (2–3 times weekly), and moderate aerobic activity 150 min/week in bouts of >10 min. PTCT included the PT and computer training (CT) on EFs 15–20 min, 3–4 times weekly. The primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were 6-min walking distance, dual-task cost in gait speed, and EF (Stroop and Trail Making B-A). The trial was completed by 93% of the participants (age 74.5 [SD3.8] years; 60% women). Mean adherence to supervised sessions was 59%–72% in PT and 62%–77% in PTCT. Home exercises and CT were performed on average 1.9 times/week. Weekly minutes spent in aerobic activities were 188 (median 169) in PT and 207 (median 180) in PTCT. No significant interactions were observed for gait speed (PTCT-PT, 0.02; 95%CI −0.03, 0.08), walking distance (−3.8; −16.9, 9.3) or dual-task cost (−0.22; −1.74, 1.30). Stroop improvement was greater after PTCT than PT (−6.9; −13.0, −0.8). Complementing physical training with EFs training is not essential for promotion of gait speed. For EF’s, complementing physical training with targeted cognitive training provides additional benefit.
KW - aging
KW - community-dwelling
KW - executive functions
KW - exercise
KW - walking
U2 - 10.1111/sms.13960
DO - 10.1111/sms.13960
M3 - Article
C2 - 33772877
AN - SCOPUS:85103590869
SN - 0905-7188
VL - 31
SP - 1518
EP - 1533
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
IS - 7
ER -