European health regulations reduce registry-based research

Oscar Brück, Enni Sanmark, Ville Ponkilainen, Alexander Bützow, Aleksi Reito, Joonas H. Kauppila, Ilari Kuitunen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The European Health Data Space (EHDS) regulation has been proposed to harmonize health data processing. Given its parallels with the Act on Secondary Use of Health and Social Data (Secondary Use Act) implemented in Finland in 2020, this study examines the consequences of heightened privacy constraints on registry-based medical research. Methods: We collected study permit counts approved by university hospitals in Finland in 2014–2023 and the data authority Findata in 2020‒2023. The changes in the study permit counts were analysed before and after the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Secondary Use Act. By fitting a linear regression model, we estimated the deficit in study counts following the Secondary Use Act. Results: Between 2020 and 2023, a median of 5.5% fewer data permits were approved annually by Finnish university hospitals. On the basis of linear regression modelling, we estimated a reduction of 46.9% in new data permits nationally in 2023 compared with the expected count. Similar changes were neither observed after the implementation of the GDPR nor in permit counts of other medical research types, confirming that the deficit was caused by the Secondary Use Act. Conclusions: This study highlights concerns related to data privacy laws for registry-based medical research and future patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number135
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Research Policy And Systems
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European health regulations reduce registry-based research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this