Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Facilitators and barriers in the rehabilitation process described by persons with spinal cord injury: a deductive-inductive analysis from the Finnish spinal cord injury study

  • Susanna Tallqvist*
  • , Kaarina Eskola
  • , Anni Täckman
  • , Anna Maija Kauppila
  • , Eerika Koskinen
  • , Heidi Anttila
  • , Marketta Rajavaara
  • , Jari Arokoski
  • , Sinikka Hiekkala
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the factors that promote and facilitate rehabilitation as well as challenges and possible barriers perceived by people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Materials and Methods: This study was part of a larger, mixed-method Finnish Spinal Cord Injury (FinSCI) study. We interviewed 45 persons with SCI representing participants from the FinSCI study and used a qualitative approach and a deductive-inductive content analysis to analyse the data. Results: We identified 28 facilitators and 19 barriers in the rehabilitation process. The majority of the facilitators and barriers were related to the rehabilitation planning phase. There were more barriers than facilitators in applying for and accessing treatment or rehabilitation and during the implementation of rehabilitation. Facilitators consisted of successful, realized, or planned treatments or rehabilitation events; clear goals; multidisciplinary teamwork; support and monitoring in various changing situations; and the rehabilitees’ own capabilities and activities, among other things. The barriers included delays, challenges and deficiencies in the planning and implementation of treatment or rehabilitation; the lack of different skills; and resources of rehabilitation professionals; and different personal factors, which made the rehabilitation process cumbersome. Conclusions: Good communication and interaction between stakeholders are crucial for the progress of rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2303398
JournalAnnals of Medicine
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This study was supported by the under Grant; the Finnish Association of People with Physical Disabilities (pr42105, 2017-2023); under Grant the Oulu University Hospital (VTR K86709, 20.10.2017); under Grant the Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation, Helsinki University Hospital (HUS/53/2017 §9, 9.6.2017, HUS/76/2018 § 11, 18.4.2018, HUS/174/2019 §1, 12.4.2019, HUS 252/2021 § 1, 24.6.2021 and HUS/130/2022 §13, 15.3.2022); and under Grant Validia Rehabilitation (HUS-VTR 9.3.2017). Open access funding was provided by the University of Helsinki, including Helsinki University Central Hospital. We wish to thank the participants for sharing their experiences. We also thank Aki Vainionpää, Harri Hämäläinen and Mauri Kallinen, who could not participate in the analysis and reporting of the study as authors but have been promoting other parts of the FinSCI study as members of the FinSCI research group.

FundersFunder number
Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation
The Finnish Association of People with Physical Disabilitiespr42105
Oulu University HospitalVTR K86709, 20.10.2017
Helsingin yliopisto
Helsingin ja Uudenmaan sairaanhoitopiiriHUS-VTR 9.3.2017, 12.4.2019, 18.4.2018, 9.6.2017, HUS/130/2022 §13, 15.3.2022, 24.6.2021

    Keywords

    • barrier
    • communication
    • facilitator
    • interaction
    • qualitative content analysis
    • rehabilitation
    • Spinal cord injury

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 2

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitators and barriers in the rehabilitation process described by persons with spinal cord injury: a deductive-inductive analysis from the Finnish spinal cord injury study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this