First-line treatment with infliximab versus conventional treatment in children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: An open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial

  • Maria M.E. Jongsma
  • , Martine A. Aardoom
  • , Martinus A. Cozijnsen
  • , Merel Van Pieterson
  • , Tim De Meij
  • , Michael Groeneweg
  • , Obbe F. Norbruis
  • , Victorien M. Wolters
  • , Herbert M. Van Wering
  • , Iva Hojsak
  • , Kaija Leena Kolho
  • , Thalia Hummel
  • , Janneke Stapelbroek
  • , Cathelijne Van Der Feen
  • , Patrick F. Van Rheenen
  • , Michiel P. Van Wijk
  • , Sarah T.A. Teklenburg-Roord
  • , Marco W.J. Schreurs
  • , Dimitris Rizopoulos
  • , Michail Doukas
  • Johanna C. Escher, Janneke N. Samsom, Lissy De Ridder*
*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    112 Citations (Scopus)
    10 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Objective: In newly diagnosed paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), infliximab (IFX) is initiated once exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapies have failed. We aimed to investigate whether starting first-line IFX (FL-IFX) is more effective to achieve and maintain remission than conventional treatment. Design: In this multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial, untreated patients with a new diagnosis of CD (3-17 years old, weighted Paediatric CD Activity Index score (wPCDAI) >40) were assigned to groups that received five infusions of 5 mg/kg IFX at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 (FL-IFX), or EEN or oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg, maximum 40 mg) (conventional). The primary outcome was clinical remission on azathioprine, defined as a wPCDAI <12.5 at week 52, without need for treatment escalation, using intention-to-treat analysis. Results: 100 patients were included, 50 in the FL-IFX group and 50 in the conventional group. Four patients did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 10, a higher proportion of patients in the FL-IFX group than in the conventional group achieved clinical (59% vs 34%, respectively, p=0.021) and endoscopic remission (59% vs 17%, respectively, p=0.001). At week 52, the proportion of patients in clinical remission was not significantly different (p=0.421). However, 19/46 (41%) patients in the FL-IFX group were in clinical remission on azathioprine monotherapy without need for treatment escalation vs 7/48 (15%) in the conventional group (p=0.004). Conclusions: FL-IFX was superior to conventional treatment in achieving short-term clinical and endoscopic remission, and had greater likelihood of maintaining clinical remission at week 52 on azathioprine monotherapy. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02517684).

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)34-42
    JournalGut
    Volume71
    Issue number1
    Early online date31 Dec 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022
    Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • IBD clinical
    • inflammatory bowel disease
    • infliximab
    • paediatric gastroenterology

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 3

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Gastroenterology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'First-line treatment with infliximab versus conventional treatment in children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: An open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this