Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Front of neck airway in Finnish helicopter emergency medical services

  • Harry Ljungqvist
  • , Miretta Tommila
  • , Piritta Setälä
  • , Lasse Raatiniemi
  • , Ilkka Pulkkinen
  • , Pamela Toivonen
  • , Jouni Nurmi*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: An emergent front of neck airway (FONA) is needed when a ‘can't intubate, can't oxygenate’ crisis occurs. A FONA may also in specific cases be the primary choice of airway management. Two techniques exist for FONA, with literature favouring the surgical technique over the percutaneous. The reported need for a prehospital FONA is fortunately rare as the mortality has been shown to be high. Due to the low incidence, literature on FONA is limited with regards to different settings, techniques and operators. As a foundation for future research and improvement of patient care, we aim to describe the frequency, indications, technique, success, and outcomes of FONA in the Finnish helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). Materials and Methods: This retrospective descriptive study reviews FONA performed at the Finnish HEMS during 1.1.2012 to 8.9.2019. The Finnish HEMS consists of six units, staffed mainly by anaesthesiologists. Clinical data was gathered from a national HEMS database and trough chart reviews. Data on mortality was obtained from a population registry. Only descriptive statistics were performed. Results: A total of 22 FONA were performed during the study period, 7 were primary and 14 performed after failure to intubate (missing data regarding indication for one attempt). This equals a 0.13 % (14/10,813) need for a rescue FONA and a rate of 0.20 % (22/10,813) FONA out of all advanced airway management. All but one FONA was performed using a surgical approach (20/21, 95 %, missing data = 1) and all were successful (22/22, 100 %). Indications were mainly cardiac arrest (10/22, 45 %) and trauma (6/22, 27 %), and the most common reason for a need for a secondary FONA was obstruction of airway by food or fluids (7/14, 50 %). On-scene mortality was 36 % (8/22) and 30-day mortality 90 % (19/21, missing data = 1). Conclusion: The need for FONA is scarce in a HEMS system with experienced airway providers. Even though the procedure is successfully performed, the mortality is markedly high.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111689
Number of pages6
JournalInjury
Volume55
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This study was supported by Helsinki University Hospital (state funding VTR TYH2022320).

FundersFunder number
Helsingin ja Uudenmaan sairaanhoitopiiriVTR TYH2022320

    Keywords

    • Air ambulances
    • Airway management
    • Critical care
    • Emergency medical services
    • Rapid sequence induction and intubation
    • Tracheostomy

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Emergency Medicine
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Front of neck airway in Finnish helicopter emergency medical services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this