Abstract
Digital twins in medicine are packaged as inevitable, disruptive technologies that will revolutionise healthcare, yet their integration into clinical practice remains slow. In this article, we extend current research on digital twins by shifting attention to the actors behind the technology and their visions. Drawing on multi-sited fieldwork, we identify from where and how the In Silico medicine community envisions the future of medicine and trace embedded ideas and logics. Our analysis reveals a friction between the narrowing of visions of medicine, the human body and clinicians and the technical features of digital twins, which are intended to open futures and possibilities through virtual interventions. We show how digital twins are developed at a distance from the very practices they seek to revolutionise and how the field attempts to navigate this distance through conversion and training. As with other digital health technologies, the burden of adjustment is placed on clinicians. By attending to how distance between modellers and clinical settings plays out in practice, we show how this “future-making from afar” constrains but also enables specific modes of engagement. It offers a starting point for demystifying digital twins in medicine and reflects on the kinds of futures the field promotes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70217 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Sociology of Health and Illness |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2026 |
| Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 3
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Future‐Making From Afar: Digital Twins in Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver