Head-to-head comparison of two human papillomavirus vaccines for efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ: population-based follow-up of two cluster-randomized trials

Matti Lehtinen, Penelope Gray, Tapio Luostarinen, Tiina Eriksson, Dan Apter, Anne Bly, Katja Harjula, Kaisa Heikkilä, Mari Hokkanen, Marjo Kuortti, Pekka Nieminen, Mervi Nummela, Jorma Paavonen, Johanna Palmroth, Tiina Petäjä, Ville N. Pimenoff, Eero Pukkala, Joakim Dillner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: We report head-to-head comparison of the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccine efficacies against immediate precursors of cervical cancer from 15 years’ country-wide cancer registry follow-up of phase III trial cohorts and an age-aligned cohort of unvaccinated women. Methods: These individually and/or clusterrandomized cohorts of HPV6/11/16/18- and HPV16/18-vaccinated and unvaccinated women were enrolled, respectively, in 2002, 2004, and 2003/2005. The trial cohorts comprised initially 16- to 17-year-old HPV6/11/16/18-vaccinated FUTURE II (NCT00092534) participants (866) and HPV16/18-vaccinated PATRICIA (NCT00122681) and 012 trial (NCT00169494) participants (2,465), and 16,526 initially 16- to 19-year-old unvaccinated controls. After active 4-year clinical follow-up, passive, country-wide Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) follow-up for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) was based on consented use of unique personal identifiers and started 6 months after the end of the FUTURE II and PATRICIA trials in 2007 and 2009, and ended at the end of 2019. The follow-up with altogether 229,020 follow-up years was age-aligned to ensure that similarly aged cohorts were passively followed up for 15 years post=vaccination for the intention-to-treat analyses of vaccine efficacy. Results: Overall, we identified 5 and 16 CIN3 (no AIS) cases in the HPV6/11/16/18 and HPV16/18 cohorts, respectively, during the FCR-based follow-up. In the unvaccinated cohort, we identified 281 CIN3 cases, 20 AIS cases, and 13 cases with invasive cervical cancer. Vaccine efficacies against CIN3+ were 68.4% and 64.5% for the quadrivalent and the bivalent vaccines, respectively, with overlapping confidence intervals. Discussion: Long-term follow-up of randomized, initially adolescent HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts shows, in this head-to-head setting, that the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines are equally effective against immediate precursors of cervical cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1437704
Number of pages7
JournalFrontiers in Cellular And Infection Microbiology
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Finnish Cancer Society, Swedish Cancer Society, and Nordic Cancer Union. The RISCC grant number 847845. Acknowledgments This work was supported by Swedish Cancerfonden, EU-RISCC network.

FundersFunder number
Cancerfonden
Swedish Cancerfonden
EU-RISCC network
Finnish Cancer Society
Nordic Cancer Union847845

    Keywords

    • cervical neoplasia
    • follow-up
    • human papillomavirus
    • randomized trial
    • vaccine efficacy

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Microbiology
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology (medical)
    • Infectious Diseases

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Head-to-head comparison of two human papillomavirus vaccines for efficacy against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ: population-based follow-up of two cluster-randomized trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this