Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib vs placebo: Results from the phase 3 randomized PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

  • Bhavana Pothuri*
  • , Sileny Han
  • , Dana M. Chase
  • , Florian Heitz
  • , Robert A. Burger
  • , Lydia Gaba
  • , Linda Van Le
  • , Eva Guerra
  • , David Bender
  • , Jacob Korach
  • , Noelle Cloven
  • , Cristina Churruca
  • , Philippe Follana
  • , Paul DiSilvestro
  • , Jean François Baurain
  • , Kris Jardon
  • , Carmela Pisano
  • , Ulla Peen
  • , Johanna Mäenpää
  • , Divya Gupta
  • Emeline Bacqué, Yong Li, Natalie Compton, Jenya Antonova, Bradley J. Monk, Antonio González-Martín
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To assess patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy. Methods: PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) enrolled patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to niraparib or placebo once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. HRQoL was assessed as a prespecified secondary end point using patient-reported responses to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC QLQ Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI), and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Assessments were collected at baseline and every 8 weeks (±7 days) for 56 weeks, beginning on cycle 1/day 1, then every 12 weeks (±7 days) thereafter while the patient received study treatment. Results: Among trial participants (niraparib, n = 487; placebo, n = 246), PRO adherence exceeded 80% for all instruments across all cycles. Patients reported no decline over time in HRQoL measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL and FOSI overall scores. Scores for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms (EORTC QLQ-OV28) and nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, and constipation (EORTC QLQ-C30) were higher (worse symptoms) in niraparib-treated patients than placebo-treated patients; except for constipation, these differences resolved over time. Patients did not self-report any worsening from baseline of fatigue, headache, insomnia, or abdominal pain on questionnaires. Conclusions: Despite some early, largely transient increases in gastrointestinal symptoms, patients with OC treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy reported no worsening in overall HRQoL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-177
Number of pages10
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume184
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This study ( NCT02655016 ) was funded by GSK .

Funders
GlaxoSmithKline

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Health-related quality of life
    • Niraparib
    • Ovarian cancer
    • PARP inhibitor
    • Patient-reported outcomes
    • Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 2

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib vs placebo: Results from the phase 3 randomized PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this