TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro and ex vivo proteomics of Mycobacterium marinum biofilms and the development of biofilm-binding synthetic nanobodies
AU - Hammarén, Milka Marjut
AU - Luukinen, Hanna
AU - Sillanpää, Alina
AU - Remans, Kim
AU - Lapouge, Karine
AU - Custódio, Tânia
AU - Löw, Christian
AU - Myllymäki, Henna
AU - Montonen, Toni
AU - Seeger, Markus
AU - Robertson, Joseph
AU - Nyman, Tuula A.
AU - Savijoki, Kirsi
AU - Parikka, Mataleena
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by the Academy of Finland: Postdoctoral Fellowship, 338624 (M.M.H.), Clinical Researcher funding 326674 (M.P.), Project funding 322010 (M.P.), funding 326584 (M.P.) and Project funding 348968 (M.P.); Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (M.M.H., M.P., H.M.); Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (M.P.), Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (M.P.), Biocenter Finland (M.P.), Core Facilities programme of the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (T.A.N.), and Research Council of Norway INFRASTRUKTUR-programme (295910).
Funding Information:
We want to thank Jacob Scheurich, Julia Flock, and Arne Börgel for the practical support at the Protein Expression and Purification Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg; Stephan Niebling at the Sample Preparation and Characterisation Core Facility at EMBL Hamburg, for the service of carrying out BLI measurements for GroEL2 sybodies; Leslie Pan for help in the setup of the sybody screening platform; Teemu Ihalainen for his advice on planning the microscopy experiments; Hannaleena Piippo for technical assistance in the experiments and laboratory organization; Joel Selkrig and Anna Sueki for discussions on bacterial surface proteomics; and Kerstin Putzker and Peter Sehr for their kind assistance with the equipment at the Chemical Biology Core Facility. The following core facilities are acknowledged for their services and support, which were essential for this work: Protein Expression and Purification Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, Proteomics Core Facility at Oslo University Hospital, Zebrafish Core Facility, Tampere University, Proteomics Core Facility EMBL Heidelberg, Sample Preparation and Characterisation Core Facility at EMBL Hamburg, Tampere Imaging Facility. The study was funded by the Academy of Finland: Postdoctoral Fellowship, 338624 (M.M.H.), Clinical Researcher funding 326674 (M.P.), Project funding 322010 (M.P.), Profiling funding 326584 (M.P.) and Project funding 348968 (M.P.); Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (M.M.H., M.P., H.M.); Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (M.P.), Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (M.P.), Biocenter Finland (M.P.), Core Facilities programme of the SouthEastern Norway Regional Health Authority (T.A.N.), and Research Council of Norway INFRASTRUKTUR-programme (295910). M.M.H.: study design and conceptualization, project coordination, funding acquisition, supervision, protein production and purification, in vitro proteomics sample preparation, sybody screening, sybody binding to biofilms method development, manuscript writing. H.L.: in vitro proteomics sample preparation, sample collection, sybody binding tests to biofilms and microscopy, image analysis, manuscript writing. A.S.: sample collection, in vitro proteomics sample preparation, binding tests to in vitro biofilms, binding tests to granulomas. K.R.: construct design and supervision of protein production and purification. K.L.: biophysical characterization of target protein, sybody screening. T.C.: sybody screening. C.L.: supervision of sybody screening. H.M.: sample collection, ex vivo proteomics sample preparation. T.M.: microscopy and image analysis. M.A.S.: conceptualization, supervision on the use of sybody libraries. J.R.: proteomics experiments. T.N.: proteomics supervision, funding acquisition. K.S.: study design and conceptualization, ex vivo proteomics sample preparation, proteomics data analysis, manuscript writing, visualization. M.P.: study design and conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition. The corresponding author confirms on behalf of all authors that there have been no involvements that might raise the question of bias in the work reported or in the conclusions, implications, or opinions stated.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Hammarén et al.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - The antibiotic-tolerant biofilms present in tuberculous granulomas add an additional layer of complexity when treating mycobacterial infections, including tuberculosis (TB). For a more efficient treatment of TB, the biofilm forms of mycobacteria warrant specific attention. Here, we used Mycobacterium marinum (Mmr) as a biofilm-forming model to identify the abundant proteins covering the biofilm surface. We used biotinylation/streptavidin-based proteomics on the proteins exposed at the Mmr biofilm matrices in vitro to identify 448 proteins and ex vivo proteomics to detect 91 Mmr proteins from the mycobacterial granulomas isolated from adult zebrafish. In vitro and ex vivo proteomics data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifiers PXD033425 and PXD039416, respectively. Data comparisons pinpointed the molecular chaperone GroEL2 as the most abundant Mmr protein within the in vitro and ex vivo proteomes, while its paralog, GroEL1, with a known role in biofilm formation, was detected with slightly lower intensity values. To validate the surface exposure of these targets, we created in-house synthetic nanobodies (sybodies) against the two chaperones and identified sybodies that bind the mycobacterial biofilms in vitro and those present in ex vivo granulomas. Taken together, the present study reports a proof-of-concept showing that surface proteomics in vitro and ex vivo proteomics combined is a valuable strategy to identify surface-exposed proteins on the mycobacterial biofilm. Biofilm surface–binding nanobodies could be eventually used as homing agents to deliver biofilm-targeting treatments to the sites of persistent biofilm infection.
AB - The antibiotic-tolerant biofilms present in tuberculous granulomas add an additional layer of complexity when treating mycobacterial infections, including tuberculosis (TB). For a more efficient treatment of TB, the biofilm forms of mycobacteria warrant specific attention. Here, we used Mycobacterium marinum (Mmr) as a biofilm-forming model to identify the abundant proteins covering the biofilm surface. We used biotinylation/streptavidin-based proteomics on the proteins exposed at the Mmr biofilm matrices in vitro to identify 448 proteins and ex vivo proteomics to detect 91 Mmr proteins from the mycobacterial granulomas isolated from adult zebrafish. In vitro and ex vivo proteomics data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifiers PXD033425 and PXD039416, respectively. Data comparisons pinpointed the molecular chaperone GroEL2 as the most abundant Mmr protein within the in vitro and ex vivo proteomes, while its paralog, GroEL1, with a known role in biofilm formation, was detected with slightly lower intensity values. To validate the surface exposure of these targets, we created in-house synthetic nanobodies (sybodies) against the two chaperones and identified sybodies that bind the mycobacterial biofilms in vitro and those present in ex vivo granulomas. Taken together, the present study reports a proof-of-concept showing that surface proteomics in vitro and ex vivo proteomics combined is a valuable strategy to identify surface-exposed proteins on the mycobacterial biofilm. Biofilm surface–binding nanobodies could be eventually used as homing agents to deliver biofilm-targeting treatments to the sites of persistent biofilm infection.
KW - biofilm
KW - biofilm-targeted therapy
KW - Mycobacterium
KW - nanobody
KW - surface proteome
KW - synthetic nanobody libraries
U2 - 10.1128/msystems.01073-22
DO - 10.1128/msystems.01073-22
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85167659974
SN - 2379-5077
VL - 8
JO - mSystems
JF - mSystems
IS - 3
ER -