Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Oberg–Manske–Tonkin classification of congenital upper limb anomalies

Ida Neergård Sletten, Mona Irene Winge, Wiebke Hülsemann, Marianne Arner, Karina Liv Hansen, Jarkko Jokihaara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    10 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    On two occasions, five surgeons classified a cohort of 150 consecutive patients with congenital upper limb anomalies according to the Oberg–Manske–Tonkin classification (2020 update). We estimated reliability for the main anomaly code by means of Cohen’s kappa (Κ) for ten rater pairs for five common and easily distinguishable anomalies (Group 1), and for all the other anomalies (Group 2). Inter-rater reliability for all patients (n = 150) was substantial, almost perfect for Group 1 (n = 64), but only moderate for Group 2 (n = 86). Intra-rater reliability was higher for all groups. We suggest simplifications to the Oberg–Manske–Tonkin classification and highlight specific requirements for instructions to increase its reliability.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1016–1024
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
    Volume47
    Issue number10
    Early online dateJun 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2022
    Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • Classification
    • congenital anomaly
    • Oberg–Manske–Tonkin
    • OMT
    • reliability

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Oberg–Manske–Tonkin classification of congenital upper limb anomalies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this