InterobServer AgreeMent in Pd-l1 evaLuatIoN on cytoloGical samples—SAMPLING project: A multi-institutional, international study

Gennaro Acanfora, Antonino Iaccarino, Bruna Cerbelli, Claudio Di Cristofano, Claudio Bellevicine, Massimo Barberis, Emanuela Bonoldi, Lukas Bubendorf, Andreas Calaminus, Severo Campione, Sule Canberk, Alberto Cavazza, Giorgio Cazzaniga, Obinna Chijioke, Eduardo Clery, Albino Eccher, Marianne Engels, Vincenzo Fiorentino, Paolo Graziano, Izidor KernIvana Kholova, Jari Laatta, Tania Labiano, Martina Leopizzi, Maria D. Lozano, Rita Luis, Elisabetta Maffei, Alessandro Marando, Maurizio Martini, Elisabetta Merenda, Marco Montella, Allan Argueta Morales, Michiya Nishino, Fabio Pagni, Paul Hofman, Angelina Pernazza, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Mauro Saieg, Spasenija Savic Prince, Momin T. Siddiqui, Tajana Stoos-Veic, Margareta Strojan Fležar, Dinka Sundov, Paul VanderLaan, Danijela Vrdoljak-Mozetič, Pio Zeppa, Giancarlo Troncone, Elena Vigliar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this project is to assess interobserver agreement for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) scoring on of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on cytological specimens in a large-scale multicenter study, by exploiting the cell block-derived tissue microarray (cbTMA) approach. Methods: A total of 65 cell blocks (CB) diagnosed as NSCLC were retrospectively collected and selected for TMA preparation. Hematoxylin–eosin and PD-L1 stained slides were digitized and uploaded on a free web sharing platform. Participants were asked to provide PD-L1 assessment by using the clinically relevant cutoff of tumor proportion score (TPS) (<1%; 1%–49%; >50%). Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss’s κ. Results: Of 65 CBs, 11 were deemed not suitable; therefore, an overall number of 54 cores were used for the preparation of four TMAs. A total of 1674 evaluations were provided by 31 cytopathologists from 21 different institutions in nine countries. The statistical analysis showed a moderate overall agreement (κ = 0.49). The highest agreement was achieved in the TPS >50% category (κ = 0.57); moderate agreement was observed in TPS <1% category (κ = 0.51) and the lowest κ value was obtained for TPS 1%–49% category (k = 0.32). Conclusions: The overall moderate agreement observed showed that there is still room for improvement in inter-pathologist agreement for PD-L1 evaluation on cytological samples, highlighting the need for standardization in sample preparation, focused training in PD-L1 evaluation on cytological material, and the integration of machine learning tools to improve interobserver consistency.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70003
Number of pages10
JournalCANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume133
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • cell block
  • cytology
  • interobserver variability
  • PD-L1
  • tissue microarray

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'InterobServer AgreeMent in Pd-l1 evaLuatIoN on cytoloGical samples—SAMPLING project: A multi-institutional, international study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this