Kanun Namına: Yöneten Kim

Translated title of the contribution: In The Name of Law: Who Rules?

Mahmut Mutman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


A founding example of classical Turkish cinema (“Yeşilçam”), Lütfi Akad’s Kanun Namına (In the Name of Law) is often read as a moral allegory about the risks and dangers of modern urban life, and as a yearning for the lost traditional family life. This article argues that its position vis a vis mo- dernity is more sophisticated than what such a “traditional” reading al- lows. From a formal point of view, Kanun Namına is avowedly and proud- ly modern. Further, its so-called moral allegory goes far beyond a simple dichotomy between tradition and modernity and involves an intricately articulated set of power relations, especially class and gender differenc- es. While its standard populism codes class difference into cultural and sexual difference, its fascination with machines and mechanical aspects of a modern city as well as the literary adventurism in its symbolic aspect undermines its apparently self-assured moral message. It turns out that, although Kanun Namına speaks in the name of law, it is perhaps not so sure who exactly rules on the level of somatic and subjective processes.
Translated title of the contributionIn The Name of Law: Who Rules?
Original languageTurkish
Article number1
Pages (from-to)7-27
Number of pages20
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed


Dive into the research topics of 'In The Name of Law: Who Rules?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this