TY - JOUR
T1 - Metastatic prostate cancer incidence and prostate-specific antigen testing: New insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
AU - Buzzoni, Carlotta
AU - Auvinen, Anssi
AU - Roobol, Monique J.
AU - Carlsson, Sigrid
AU - Moss, Sue M.
AU - Puliti, Donella
AU - De Koning, Harry J.
AU - Bangma, Chris H.
AU - Denis, Louis J.
AU - Kwiatkowski, Maciej
AU - Lujan, Marcos
AU - Nelen, Vera
AU - Paez, Alvaro
AU - Randazzo, Marco
AU - Rebillard, Xavier
AU - Tammela, Teuvo L.J.
AU - Villers, Arnauld
AU - Hugosson, Jonas
AU - Schröder, Fritz H.
AU - Zappa, Marco
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown a 21% reduction in prostate cancer (PCa) mortality and a 1.6-fold increase in PCa incidence with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening (at 13 yr of follow-up). We evaluated PCa incidence by risk category at diagnosis across the study arms to assess the potential impact on PCa mortality. Design, setting, and participants Information on arm, centre, T and M stage, Gleason score, serum PSA at diagnosis, age at randomisation, follow-up time, and vital status were extracted from the ERSPC database. Four risk categories at diagnosis were defined: 1, low: 2, intermediate: 3, high: 4, metastatic disease. PSA (≤100 or >100 ng/ml) was used as the indicator of metastasis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for screening versus control arm by risk category at diagnosis and follow-up time were calculated using Poisson regression analysis for seven centres. Follow-up was truncated at 13 yr. Missing data were imputed using chained equations. The analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. Results and limitations In the screening arm, 7408 PCa cases were diagnosed and 6107 in the control arm. The proportion of missing stage, Gleason score, or PSA value was comparable in the two arms (8% vs 10%), but differed among centres. The IRRs were elevated in the screening arm for the low-risk (IRR: 2.14: 95% CI, 2.03-2.25) and intermediate-risk (IRR: 1.24: 95% CI, 1.16-1.34) categories at diagnosis, equal to unity for the high-risk category at diagnosis (IRR: 1.00: 95% CI, 0.89-1.13), and reduced for metastatic disease at diagnosis (IRR: 0.60: 95% CI, 0.52-0.70). The IRR of metastatic disease had temporal pattern similar to mortality, shifted forwards an average of almost 3 yr, although the mortality reduction was smaller. Conclusions The results confirm a reduction in metastatic disease at diagnosis in the screening arm, preceding mortality reduction by almost 3 yr. Patient summary The findings of this study indicate that the decrease in metastatic disease at diagnosis is the major determinant of the prostate cancer mortality reduction in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
AB - Background The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has shown a 21% reduction in prostate cancer (PCa) mortality and a 1.6-fold increase in PCa incidence with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening (at 13 yr of follow-up). We evaluated PCa incidence by risk category at diagnosis across the study arms to assess the potential impact on PCa mortality. Design, setting, and participants Information on arm, centre, T and M stage, Gleason score, serum PSA at diagnosis, age at randomisation, follow-up time, and vital status were extracted from the ERSPC database. Four risk categories at diagnosis were defined: 1, low: 2, intermediate: 3, high: 4, metastatic disease. PSA (≤100 or >100 ng/ml) was used as the indicator of metastasis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for screening versus control arm by risk category at diagnosis and follow-up time were calculated using Poisson regression analysis for seven centres. Follow-up was truncated at 13 yr. Missing data were imputed using chained equations. The analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. Results and limitations In the screening arm, 7408 PCa cases were diagnosed and 6107 in the control arm. The proportion of missing stage, Gleason score, or PSA value was comparable in the two arms (8% vs 10%), but differed among centres. The IRRs were elevated in the screening arm for the low-risk (IRR: 2.14: 95% CI, 2.03-2.25) and intermediate-risk (IRR: 1.24: 95% CI, 1.16-1.34) categories at diagnosis, equal to unity for the high-risk category at diagnosis (IRR: 1.00: 95% CI, 0.89-1.13), and reduced for metastatic disease at diagnosis (IRR: 0.60: 95% CI, 0.52-0.70). The IRR of metastatic disease had temporal pattern similar to mortality, shifted forwards an average of almost 3 yr, although the mortality reduction was smaller. Conclusions The results confirm a reduction in metastatic disease at diagnosis in the screening arm, preceding mortality reduction by almost 3 yr. Patient summary The findings of this study indicate that the decrease in metastatic disease at diagnosis is the major determinant of the prostate cancer mortality reduction in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
KW - Metastatic cancer incidence
KW - Mortality reduction
KW - PSA
KW - Prostate screening
KW - Metastatic cancer incidence
KW - Mortality reduction
KW - PSA
KW - Prostate screening
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.042
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84942983796
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 68
SP - 885
EP - 890
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 5
ER -