Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non-interventional follow-up versus fluid bolus in RESPONSE to oliguria in hemodynamically stable critically ill patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial

  • Nina Inkinen
  • , Ville Pettilä
  • , Miia Valkonen
  • , Maija Serlo
  • , Minna Bäcklund
  • , Johanna Hästbacka
  • , Anni Pulkkinen
  • , Tuomas Selander
  • , Suvi T Vaara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluid bolus therapy is a common intervention to improve urine output. Data concerning the effect of a fluid bolus on oliguria originate mainly from observational studies and remain controversial regarding the actual benefit of such therapy. We compared the effect of a follow-up approach without fluid bolus to a 500 mL fluid bolus on urine output in hemodynamically stable critically ill patients with oliguria at least for 2 h (urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h) in randomized setting.

METHODS: We randomized 130 patients in 1:1 fashion to receive either (1) non-interventional follow-up (FU) for 2 h or (2) 500 mL crystalloid fluid bolus (FB) administered over 30 min. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who doubled their urine output, defined as 2-h urine output post-randomization divided by urine output 2 h pre-randomization. The outcomes were adjusted for the stratification variables (presence of sepsis or AKI) using two-tailed regression. Obtained odds ratios were converted to risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The between-group difference in the continuous variables was compared using mean or median regression and expressed with 95% CIs.

RESULTS: Altogether 10 (15.9%) of 63 patients in the FU group and 22 (32.8%) of 67 patients in FB group doubled their urine output during the 2-h period, RR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.23-0.71), P = 0.026. Median [IQR] change in individual urine output 2 h post-randomization compared to 2 h pre-randomization was - 7 [- 19 to 17] mL in the FU group and 19[0-53] mL in the FB group, median difference (95% CI) - 23 (- 36 to - 10) mL, P = 0.001. Median [IQR] duration of oliguria in the FU group was 4 [2-8] h and in the FB group 2 [0-6] h, median difference (95%CI) 2 (0-4) h, P = 0.038. Median [IQR] cumulative fluid balance on study day was lower in the FU group compared to FB group, 678 [518-1029] mL versus 1071 [822-1505] mL, respectively, median difference (95%CI) - 387 (- 635 to - 213) mL, P < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up approach to oliguria compared to administering a fluid bolus of 500 mL crystalloid in oliguric patients improved urine output less frequently but lead to lower cumulative fluid balance. Trial registration clinical.

TRIALS: gov, NCT02860572. Registered 9 August 2016.

Original languageEnglish
Article number401
JournalCritical Care
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Oliguria/therapy
  • Critical Illness/therapy
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Pilot Projects
  • Acute Kidney Injury/therapy
  • Fluid Therapy
  • Crystalloid Solutions/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-interventional follow-up versus fluid bolus in RESPONSE to oliguria in hemodynamically stable critically ill patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this