On the Ambivalence of recognition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review


In this article I address the idea that recognition is fundamentally ambivalent: not only can there be bad forms of recognition – misrecognition, nonrecognition, disrespect – but that even the good or adequate forms of recognition may in some ways be detrimental to the recipient or sustain societal domination (Ikäheimo, Lepold, Stahl, eds. 2021). One version of the challenge is that social movements do better by focusing on other concepts than recognition, for their progressive aims. I will discuss the non-consequentialist nature of adequacy of recognition, value pluralism, the rewards of submissiveness, dialectical progression to adequate recognition, and “ambivalence of being” as providing partial explanations for the ambivalence of recognition, while arguing that adequate recognition is only contingently ambivalent. By discussing these challenges, I continue to articulate a conception of mutual recognition and misrecognition that I have developed earlier (Laitinen 2002, 2003, 2010, 2012, Ikäheimo & Laitinen 2007).
Original languageEnglish
JournalItinerari. Annuario di ricerche filosofiche.
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed


  • Ambivalence
  • Recognition
  • Misrecognition
  • Non-consequentialism
  • Pluralism
  • Respect
  • Esteem

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 0


Dive into the research topics of 'On the Ambivalence of recognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this