Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On the determination of χ(2) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies

  • Artur Hermans
  • , Clemens Kieninger
  • , Kalle Koskinen
  • , Andreas Wickberg
  • , Eduardo Solano
  • , Jolien Dendooven
  • , Martti Kauranen
  • , Stéphane Clemmen
  • , Martin Wegener
  • , Christian Koos
  • , Roel Baets

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)
    46 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The determination of the second-order susceptibility (χ(2)) of thin film samples can be a delicate matter since well-established χ(2) measurement methodologies such as the Maker fringe technique are best suited for nonlinear materials with large thicknesses typically ranging from tens of microns to several millimeters. Here we compare two different second-harmonic generation setups and the corresponding measurement methodologies that are especially advantageous for thin film χ(2) characterization. This exercise allows for cross-checking the χ(2) obtained for identical samples and identifying the main sources of error for the respective techniques. The development of photonic integrated circuits makes nonlinear thin films of particular interest, since they can be processed into long waveguides to create efficient nonlinear devices. The investigated samples are ABC-type nanolaminates, which were reported recently by two different research groups. However, the subsequent analysis can be useful for all researchers active in the field of thin film χ(2) characterization.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number44581
    JournalScientific Reports
    Volume7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2017
    Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 2

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the determination of χ(2) in thin films: a comparison of one-beam second-harmonic generation measurement methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this