One-Dimensional vs. Three-Dimensional Models in Free Vibration Analysis of Axially Functionally Graded Beams with Non-Uniform Cross-Sections

V. N. Burlayenko, R. Kouhia, S. D. Dimitrova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparison of one-dimensional (1D) and three-dimensional (3D) models for simulating free vibrations of axially functionally graded material (AFGM) beams with non-uniform cross-sections was carried out. Both models were constructed using ABAQUS and the eigenvalue problem was solved to determine the natural frequencies and their corresponding mode shapes. User-defined material model subroutines (UMAT) were developed using 1D beam or 3D hexagonal graded finite elements to implement material gradients into appropriate finite element models. The performance of both models was evaluated using data for beams with non-uniform cross-sections and material gradation profiles for which natural frequencies were available in the literature. The accuracy and effectiveness of each modeling approach proposed were estimated by comparing the results obtained. Generally, distinctions between the 1D and 3D models become more pronounced as the geometric complexity and material inhomogeneity of AFGM beams increases, especially for high-frequency modes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-102
JournalMECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • ABAQUS user-defined subroutine
  • axially functionally graded beam
  • free vibrations
  • graded finite element
  • non-uniform cross-section beam

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Biomaterials
  • General Mathematics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Polymers and Plastics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One-Dimensional vs. Three-Dimensional Models in Free Vibration Analysis of Axially Functionally Graded Beams with Non-Uniform Cross-Sections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this