Performance Indicator in Multilinear Compressive Learning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Recently, the Multilinear Compressive Learning (MCL) framework was proposed to efficiently optimize the sensing and learning steps when working with multidimensional signals, i.e. tensors. In Compressive Learning in general, and in MCL in particular, the number of compressed measurements captured by a compressive sensing device characterizes the storage requirement or the bandwidth requirement for transmission. This number, however, does not completely characterize the learning performance of a MCL system. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between the input signal resolution, the number of compressed measurements and the learning performance of MCL. Our empirical analysis shows that the reconstruction error obtained at the initialization step of MCL strongly correlates with the learning performance, thus can act as a good indicator to efficiently characterize learning performances obtained from different sensor configurations without optimizing the entire system.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)
PublisherIEEE
Pages1822-1828
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-7281-2547-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020
Publication typeA4 Article in conference proceedings
EventIEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence - Canberra, Australia
Duration: 1 Dec 20204 Dec 2020

Conference

ConferenceIEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityCanberra
Period1/12/204/12/20

Keywords

  • Performance evaluation
  • Sensors
  • Signal resolution
  • Robot sensing systems
  • Optimization
  • Tensors
  • Task analysis

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance Indicator in Multilinear Compressive Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this