Positioning with master and counter-narratives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Narrative studies have witnessed a growing interest towards positioning analyses and the analysis of master and counter-narratives. While the former tends to prefer a small story approach and to draw on Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis, the latter engages in a variety of methodological approaches and works with narratives of several sizes, often within institutional and political contexts. Counter-narrative is a positional category by name, and it has recently been brought together with positioning analysis in the study of oral narratives. However, the narrative nature of master narratives, as well as their conceptual distinction from dominant discourses, remains largely unaddressed. This article aims at placing master narratives within narrative theory. To that end, we consider the three analytical levels of narrative positioning in terms of master and counter-narratives. By analysing an interview with a 92-year-old Finnish woman, we argue for the empirical relevance of master and counter-narratives within positioning analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-125
Number of pages28
JournalNARRATIVE INQUIRY
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Canonicity
  • Master and counter-narrative
  • Narrative contestation
  • Positioning

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positioning with master and counter-narratives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this