Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictors of short-term response and the role of heavy alcohol use in treatment of depression

  • Kaisa E. Luoto*
  • , Antero Lassila
  • , Esa Leinonen
  • , Olli Kampman
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Depression and alcohol use disorders frequently co-occur. However, research on psychosocial interventions for treating this dual pathology is limited. The Ostrobothnian Depression Study (ODS) aimed to increase the systematic use of evidence-based methods, particularly among patients with comorbid depression and substance use in a naturalistic setting. This is a secondary analysis of the ODS study. The aim of the present study was to explore the predictors of a response to treatment during the first six months of the ODS intervention with a specific focus on the role of comorbid heavy alcohol use. Methods: The study sample (n = 242) comprised psychiatric specialist care patients with depression (Beck Depression Inventory score ≥ 17) at baseline. Patients with a baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score > 10 (n = 99) were assigned to the AUD (Alcohol Use Disorder) group in this study. The ODS intervention comprised behavioral activation (BA) for all and additional motivational interviewing (MI) for those in AUD group. The predictors of response to treatment (minimum of 50% reduction in depressive symptoms) during the first six months were analyzed with logistic regression models. Results: In the total sample at six months (n = 150), predictors of response to treatment were more severe depression (OR 1.10, CI 1.02–1.18), larger amounts of alcohol consumed (OR = 1.16, CI 1.03–1.31) and antipsychotic medication “not in use” (OR = 0.17, CI 0.07–0.44). In the non-AUD group (n = 100), more severe depression (OR 1.12, CI 1.01–1.25) and antipsychotics “not in use” (OR 0.20, CI 0.06–0.67) also predicted a positive response. Among AUD group patients (n = 50), larger amounts of alcohol consumed (OR 1.54, CI 1.04–2.27) and antipsychotic medication “not in use” (OR 0.12, CI 0.02–0.60) predicted a response to the treatment intervention. Conclusions: The severity of symptoms and comorbid disorders were found to predict better treatment response, suggesting that the intervention was more effective in patients with severe symptoms. Patients with depression should be treated effectively regardless of having concomitant AUD. The results of this study suggest that BA combined with MI should be one of the treatment options for this dual pathology. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02520271 (11/08/2015).

Original languageEnglish
Article number880
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This work was financially supported by a grant from the Finnish Medical Foundation (grant number 4282) and by the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Tampere University Hospital (9AB022).

FundersFunder number
Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö4282, 9AB022

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Alcohol Use Disorder
    • Depression
    • Outcome

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 2

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of short-term response and the role of heavy alcohol use in treatment of depression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this