Abstract
Until about 25 years ago, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland and Finland used a bureaucratic-professional governance model to reach common welfare goals in ECEC, something that arguably constituted a Nordic dimension. Since then, the countries have introduced post-bureaucratic governance models such as evaluation and quasi-markets in varying degrees. Differences in the timing of policy changes and saturation of demand have resulted in variations in the use of quasi-market instruments and divergence in the composition of public, for-profit and non-profit providers. However, common welfare goals, such as inclusion and language learning, have been strengthened. We base our analysis on existing research, statistics and policy papers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 60–77 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | NORDIC STUDIES IN EDUCATION |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 1