Abstract
Until about 25 years ago, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland and Finland used a bureaucratic-professional governance model to reach common welfare goals in ECEC, something that arguably constituted a Nordic dimension. Since then, the countries have introduced post-bureaucratic governance models such as evaluation and quasi-markets in varying degrees. Differences in the timing of policy changes and saturation of demand have resulted in variations in the use of quasi-market instruments and divergence in the composition of public, for-profit and non-profit providers. However, common welfare goals, such as inclusion and language learning, have been strengthened. We base our analysis on existing research, statistics and policy papers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 60–77 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Nordic Studies in Education |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
| Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 1
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quasi-Market Regulation in Early Childhood Education and Care: Does a Nordic Welfare Dimension Prevail?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver