Real-world guideline-based treatment of lung cancer improves short- and long-term outcomes and resection rate: A population-based study

Olli Helminen, Johanna Valo, Heidi Andersen, Anna Lautamäki, Vilma Vuohelainen, Eero Sihvo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent guidelines for the treatment of lung cancer include comprehensive lists of recommendations for pre-operative risk evaluation, staging, and surgery. Our aim was to evaluate whether the implementation of these in a population-based real-world setting would improve outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer in Central Finland and Ostrobothnia between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2017, were identified from registry data (N = 2116), including patients who underwent surgical resection (n = 303). Data were divided into two periods, old and modern, according to which international guidelines were followed.

RESULTS: Between surgical patients of the old and modern periods, significant changes occurred in the rate of pre-operative stair climbing tests (3.7 % vs. 68.6 %, p < 0.001), the use of positron emission computed tomography (18.7 % vs. 75.7 %, p < 0.001), and invasive staging (3.7 % vs. 26.0 %, p < 0.001). In surgery, the rate of VATS (2.2 % vs. 81.1 %, p < 0.001), segmentectomy (1.5 % vs. 27.2 %, p < 0.001), and extended resections (5.2 % vs. 13.6 %, p = 0.015) increased. However, between these periods, the rate of pneumonectomy decreased from 7.5 % to 1.2 % (p = 0.005) and bilobectomy from 9.0%-1.8% (p = 0.004). The overall resection rate increased from 10.5%-19.7 %, mainly due to a higher number of high-risk patients (12.7 % vs. 34.3 %, p < 0.001). Patients faced fewer major complications (21.6 % vs. 8.9 %, p = 0.002) and had shorter hospital stays (9 days, IQR 7-11 vs. 5 days, IQR 3-7; p < 0.001). In the modern period, patients underwent adjuvant therapy less often than in the old period (35.1 % vs. 22.5 %, p = 0.015). Recurrence-free 5-year survival rate improved, however, from 64.0%-76.8% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of guideline-based modern patient evaluation and treatment was associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes of lung cancer surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalLung cancer
Volume140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020
Externally publishedYes
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma of Lung/mortality
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Lung Neoplasms/mortality
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pneumonectomy/mortality
  • Survival Rate
  • Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/mortality
  • Thoracotomy/mortality
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world guideline-based treatment of lung cancer improves short- and long-term outcomes and resection rate: A population-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this