Reimagining bureaucracy? Enhancing the participation of children in vulnerable positions in law-making

  • Essi Julin
  • , Timo Harrikari*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Children have the right to participate in public matters. While children’s participation has been widely studied in various fields, its realisation and conceptualisation in the specific context of law-making remains limited and under-examined. Law-making is typically shaped by bureaucratic procedures, which often result in the exclusion of children and young people. However, the growing emphasis on a ‘participatory turn’ suggests that citizens, including children, should be actively involved. This article explores the capabilities lawmakers need to enhance the participation of children in vulnerable positions in legislative processes. The study draws on interviews with 22 Finnish child welfare experts, analysed using thematic content analysis. The findings reveal that both external and internal capabilities are necessary for lawmakers to promote children’s participation. These capabilities include knowledge of children’s rights, practical know-how, and enabling structures. While bureaucracies have their strengths, lawmakers must break free from the ‘iron cages of bureaucracy’ and seek a better balance between bureaucratic processes and participatory practices to ensure the inclusion of children in vulnerable positions in law-making.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal studies of childhood
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Sept 2025
Externally publishedYes
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • bureaucracy
  • capabilities approach
  • children
  • law-making
  • participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reimagining bureaucracy? Enhancing the participation of children in vulnerable positions in law-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this