Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the ONAPS physical activity questionnaire in assessing physical activity and sedentary behavior in French adults

  • Marc Charles*
  • , David Thivel
  • , Julien Verney
  • , Laurie Isacco
  • , Pauliina Husu
  • , Henri Vähä-Ypyä
  • , Tommi Vasankari
  • , Michèle Tardieu
  • , Alicia Fillon
  • , Pauline Genin
  • , Benjamin Larras
  • , Bruno Chabanas
  • , Bruno Pereira
  • , Martine Duclos
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)
    30 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of a new questionnaire, the ONAPS-PAQ, developed to assess physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB) in the general population. A total of 137 healthy adults aged 18 to 69 years were included. Following completion of two physical activity questionnaires (ONAPS-PAQ and GPAQ, the Global physical activity question-naire) to study concurrent validity, participants wore an accelerometer (UKK-RM42) for 7 days to study criterion validity. A subsample (n = 36) also completed a 7-day-interval test–retest protocol to assess its reliability. Reliability was tested by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa coefficient; concurrent and criterion validity by the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) and Bland-Altman plot analyses. The ONAPS-PAQ showed good reliability (ICC = 0.71–0.98; Kappa = 0.61–0.99) and concurrent validity (ρ = 0.56–0.86), but only poor criterion validity (ρ = 0.26–0.41), and wide limits of agreement. Self-reported and accelerometer-measured SB were better correlated with ONAPS-PAQ than GPAQ (0.41 vs. 0.26, respectively) and medians were comparable, whereas the GPAQ underestimated SB (SBacc = 481 (432–566), SBONAPS = 480 (360–652), SBGPAQ = 360 (240–540) min·day−1; median (q1-q3)). The ONAPS-PAQ provides good reliability and acceptable validity for the measurement of PA and SB and seems to provide a better assessment of SB than GPAQ.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number5643
    JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Volume18
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021
    Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Funding

    Funding: This research received a specific grant from the National Observatory of Physical Activity and Sedentariness (ONAPS).

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Accelerometry
    • Concurrent validity
    • Criterion validity
    • Self-report
    • Test–retest study

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pollution
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of the ONAPS physical activity questionnaire in assessing physical activity and sedentary behavior in French adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this