Abstract
Agile software development was introduced in the beginning of the 2000s to increase the visibility and efficiency software projects. Since then it has become as an industry standard. However, fitting sequential security engineering development models into iterative and incremental development practices in agile methods has caused difficulties in defining, implementing, and verifying the security properties of software. In addition, agile methods have also been criticized for decreased quality of documentation, resulting in decreased security assurance necessary for regulative purposes and security measurement. As a consequence, lack of security assurance can complicate security incident management, thus increasing the software's potential lifetime cost. This chapter clarifies the requirements for software security assurance by using an evaluation framework to analyze the compatibility of established agile security development methods: XP, Scrum, and Kanban. The results show that the agile methods are not inherently incompatible with security engineering requirements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Exploring Security in Software Architecture and Design |
| Publisher | IGI Global |
| Chapter | 3 |
| Pages | 47-68 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781522563136 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2019 |
| Publication type | A3 Book chapter |
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 1
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Security Assurance in Agile Software Development Methods: An Analysis of Scrum, XP and Kanban'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver