Sixth graders evaluating online texts: self-efficacy beliefs predict confirming but not questioning the credibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigated how sixth graders’ credibility evaluation self-efficacy was associated with their ability to evaluate the credibility of online texts. Students (N = 265, Mage = 12.45) worked in a web-based environment, where they read and evaluated two more credible texts and two less credible texts that required confirming and questioning the texts’ credibility, respectively. Students were asked to evaluate the author’s expertise, the author’s benevolence, and the quality of evidence in each text. They were also asked to assess their credibility evaluation self-efficacy during the task. The structural equation model indicated that students’ self-efficacy was positively associated with their ability to confirm the more credible texts but not with their ability to question the less credible texts. The instructional implications of this study are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Educational Research
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Jun 2023
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • online evaluation
  • self-efficacy
  • digital literacies
  • credibility evaluation
  • primary school students

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sixth graders evaluating online texts: self-efficacy beliefs predict confirming but not questioning the credibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this