Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Social capital in participatory arts for wellbeing: Findings from a systematic review of qualitative research

  • Norma Daykin
  • , Louise Mansfield
  • , Catherine Meads
  • , Karen Gray
  • , Alex Golding
  • , Alan Tomlinson
  • , Christina R. Victor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)
37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Social capital is often cited as shaping impacts of participatory arts, although the concept has not been systematically mapped in arts, health and wellbeing contexts. In wider health inequalities research, complex, differential, and sometimes negative impacts of social capital have been recognised.

Methods
This paper maps of social capital concepts in qualitative research as part of the UK What Works for Wellbeing evidence review programme on culture, sport and wellbeing.

Results
Studies often cite positive impacts of bonding and, to a lesser extent, bridging social capital. However, reported challenges suggest the need for a critical approach. Forms of linking social capital, such as reframing and political engagement to address social divisions, are less often cited but may be important in participatory arts and wellbeing.

Conclusions
Future research should further specify dimensions of social capital as well as their nuanced effects in arts, and wellbeing contexts.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArts and Health
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2020
Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Publication forum classification

  • Publication forum level 1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social capital in participatory arts for wellbeing: Findings from a systematic review of qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this