Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: A 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial

  • Mika Paavola*
  • , Kari Kanto
  • , Jonas Ranstam
  • , Antti Malmivaara
  • , Jari Inkinen
  • , Juha Kalske
  • , Vesa Savolainen
  • , Ilkka Sinisaari
  • , Simo Taimela
  • , Teppo LN Järvinen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    49 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison). Methods: We conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35-65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry. Results: In the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were -2.0 (95% CI -8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and -8.0 (-17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (-5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and -3.9 (-12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events. Conclusions: ASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)99-107
    JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
    Volume55
    Issue number2
    Early online date5 Oct 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
    Publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • acromioplasty
    • impingement
    • physiotherapy
    • placebo
    • randomised
    • sham
    • shoulder

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 2

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: A 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this