Abstract
Background: Sustainable work ability is a multifaceted concept that
involves the matching of the needs and abilities of the individual with the quality
of work. Good work ability during a work career is one of the potential indicators
of sustainable work ability and employment, as it requires a good balance
between individual resources and work demands. We aimed to study the
developmental pathways of work ability during midlife until retirement and its
impact on functional health in terms of mobility limitations in old age using
longitudinal data on employees in a large amount of blue- and white-collar
occupations. Furthermore, we studied the difference in survival among people in
different trajectory groups. Methods: Questionnaire data on work ability, working
conditions, lifestyle, and physical functioning of middle-aged municipal
employees (n = 2918) were linked with registers on retirement and all-cause
mortality. Perceived work ability was measured as the current work ability
compared with the lifetime best in a score of 0 to 10. The trajectory of work ability
was analyzed by using growth mixture modeling in 16 years of follow-up data.
Mobility limitations as an outcome was defined using nine items related to
physical mobility tasks. Trajectory membership of work ability was used as a
predictor of mobility limitation after 12 years using generalized linear models.
Cumulative hazard curves for mortality by trajectory group were calculated.
Results: Three distinct trajectories of work ability emerged. The majority of the
participants (65%) had good work ability, which is here defined as sustainable
work ability, 25% having L-shaped decreasing work ability and 10% having U-
shaped decreasing work ability. Demographics, lifestyle factors, morbidity, and
physical workload-adjusted models shows that L-shaped (Incidence rate ratio
(IRR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.30) and U-shaped (IRR 1.37, 95% CI
1.28–1.47) work ability trajectory membership was strongly associated with a
higher risk of mobility limitations in the next 12 years of follow-up. The
cumulative hazard for all-cause mortality was highest among those in the U-
shaped decreasing work ability trajectory group. Conclusions: Those with a
sustainable work ability during midlife showed a lower risk of mobility
limitations and better survival compared to those with decreasing work ability.
These findings highlight the importance of sustainable work ability throughout
the working career as well as the need for early identification of workers with
diminishing work ability and need for workplace interventions to help to promote
an extended working career as well as a healthy old age.
involves the matching of the needs and abilities of the individual with the quality
of work. Good work ability during a work career is one of the potential indicators
of sustainable work ability and employment, as it requires a good balance
between individual resources and work demands. We aimed to study the
developmental pathways of work ability during midlife until retirement and its
impact on functional health in terms of mobility limitations in old age using
longitudinal data on employees in a large amount of blue- and white-collar
occupations. Furthermore, we studied the difference in survival among people in
different trajectory groups. Methods: Questionnaire data on work ability, working
conditions, lifestyle, and physical functioning of middle-aged municipal
employees (n = 2918) were linked with registers on retirement and all-cause
mortality. Perceived work ability was measured as the current work ability
compared with the lifetime best in a score of 0 to 10. The trajectory of work ability
was analyzed by using growth mixture modeling in 16 years of follow-up data.
Mobility limitations as an outcome was defined using nine items related to
physical mobility tasks. Trajectory membership of work ability was used as a
predictor of mobility limitation after 12 years using generalized linear models.
Cumulative hazard curves for mortality by trajectory group were calculated.
Results: Three distinct trajectories of work ability emerged. The majority of the
participants (65%) had good work ability, which is here defined as sustainable
work ability, 25% having L-shaped decreasing work ability and 10% having U-
shaped decreasing work ability. Demographics, lifestyle factors, morbidity, and
physical workload-adjusted models shows that L-shaped (Incidence rate ratio
(IRR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.30) and U-shaped (IRR 1.37, 95% CI
1.28–1.47) work ability trajectory membership was strongly associated with a
higher risk of mobility limitations in the next 12 years of follow-up. The
cumulative hazard for all-cause mortality was highest among those in the U-
shaped decreasing work ability trajectory group. Conclusions: Those with a
sustainable work ability during midlife showed a lower risk of mobility
limitations and better survival compared to those with decreasing work ability.
These findings highlight the importance of sustainable work ability throughout
the working career as well as the need for early identification of workers with
diminishing work ability and need for workplace interventions to help to promote
an extended working career as well as a healthy old age.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Transitioning to Good Health and Well-Being |
Editors | Antoine Flahault |
Publisher | MDPI AG |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-03897-865-7 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-03897-864-0 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Publication type | A3 Book chapter |
Publication series
Name | Transitioning to Sustainability |
---|---|
Publisher | MDPI |
ISSN (Print) | 2624-9324 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2624-9332 |
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 0