Abstract
Data on biomechanical overload of the upper limb in animal facility operators are currently scanty. We decided to study this risk in a university animal facility. Eleven different tasks performed by operators were identified. For each of them, the biomechanical overload of the upper limb was evaluated by applying 4 different methods frequently used, hypothesising a task duration of 4 and 8 h. Then two ‘typical’ real working days of the examined facility were reconstructed, and the risk for operators was calculated using the OCRA Index, Checklist and Mini-Checklist. Considering the specific tasks, the results show some difference among methods, but the overall results show an acceptable/slight risk of biomechanical overload of the upper limb in animal facility operators during typical working days. Practitioner Summary: Upper limb biomechanical overload (UL-BO) is a neglected risk in animal facilities. In a university facility, 11 different tasks were identified, and 2 typical working days were analysed. Even if some task at increased risk may exist, during typical working days, the overall results show that the risk of UL-BO in operators can be considered usually acceptable or, at worst, slight.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 366-374 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Ergonomics |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- animal facility
- Biomechanical overload
- musculoskeletal disorders
- upper limb
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 1
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Human Factors and Ergonomics
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation