Abstract
This study examines the homogeneity of BIG4 audit reports after implementing key audit matters (KAMs) in the context of fair value accounting. We focus on reported KAMs and the procedures related to the fair values of investment properties, particularly those related to challenging management's estimations and valuation specialists' use. Our data consist of 235 individual audit reports from the real estate sector from 2017 to 2018 and cover 60% of the listed real estate companies in the EU, Switzerland, and Norway. We found that the BIG4 audit firms are not homogenous in their audit reports. There is a statistically significant difference among the BIG4 audit firms in reporting the challenge of management estimates and in the number of audit procedures. We also found that a country's legal origin plays a significant role when auditors report KAMs. Our findings contribute to the current audit quality and reporting literature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 354-370 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International Journal of Auditing |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2022 |
| Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Keywords
- audit quality
- BIG4
- fair value
- IFRS
- investment properties
- key audit matter
- the challenge of management estimation
- use of specialists
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 1
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The homogeneity of BIG4 audit reports after the implementation of key audit matters in the context of fair value accounting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver