Abstract
Is Yogācāra a system of idealist metaphysics or a theory of experience without metaphysical commitments? An increasing amount of literature has argued, since the 1980s, in favor of the second answer. In this paper, I propose to review the background to the question. In fact, most of the attempts to answer the question have been made with reference to Buddhist texts and concepts. However, labels such as “idealism” emerged from Western philosophy and are reflective of specific historical situations and problems. Extending their use to other contexts requires that these specificities are taken into account. Building on an historical survey, I suggest that some essential features of Yogācāra correspond to features of an ancient Greek tradition of metaphysics that has been characterized as idealist: Neoplatonism. On this basis, I come back to the initial question and argue in favor of the idealist interpretation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 707-730 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- Comparative philosophy
- Idealism
- Mahāyāna Buddhism
- Metaphysics
- Plotinus
- Proclus
- Vasubandhu
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- Philosophy