Abstract
Objectives: There is no strong evidence to support or reject the use of patch angioplasty (PA) after femoral endarterectomy (FE). The current study aimed to assess early postoperative complications and compare primary patency (PP) rates after FE in patients treated with PA versus direct closure (DC). Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients admitted during 06/2002–07/2017 with signs and symptoms of chronic lower limb ischemia (Rutherford categories 2–6). Patients with angiographically confirmed stenoses or occlusions of the common femoral arteries (CFAs) and managed with FE with or without PA were included in the study. Early postoperative wound complications were assessed. The PP analysis was based on imaging-confirmed data. The impact of PA on the patency was evaluated in a confounder-adjusted Cox regression model. PP rates were compared with log-rank between the PA and DC groups using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in the propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts. Results: A total of 295 primary FEs were identified. The patients’ median age was 75 years. A total of 210 patients were managed with PA and 85 with DC. Altogether, 38 (12.9%) local wound complications were registered, 15 (5.1%) of which required re-interventions. There were 9 (3.2%) cases of deep wound infection, 20 (7.0%) seromas, and 11 (3.9%) cases of major bleeding, with no significant difference between the PA and DC groups. All of the infected patches were made of synthetic material, and 83% of them were removed. The PP analysis was performed on 50 PSM patient pairs with a median age of 74 years. The median imaging-confirmed follow-up lengths were 77 months (IQR = 47 months) for the PA patients and 27 months (IQR = 64 months) for the DC patients. The preoperative median diameter of the CFA was 8.8 mm (IQR = 3.4). The 5 year primary patency rates of CFAs with a minimum diameter of 5.5 mm managed with PA or DC exceeded 91%, p > 0.05. Female sex was associated with the loss of PP, odds ratio 4.17, p = 0.046. Conclusions: Wound complications after FE with or without patching are not uncommon and often lead to reoperations. The PP rates of CFAs with a minimum diameter of 5.5 mm and accomplished with or without patching are comparable. Female sex is associated with the loss of patency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 997-1004 |
| Journal | Vascular |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
| Publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was financially supported by Viipurin Tuberkuloosisäätiö (grant number n/a). Address: Maaherrankatu 13C. 53100 Lappeenranta, Finland. Email: [email protected] .
Keywords
- common femoral artery
- endarterectomy
- vascular
- vascular closure patches
Publication forum classification
- Publication forum level 1
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To patch, or not to patch a common femoral artery, that is the question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver