To UML or not to UML? – Empirical Study on the Approachability of Software Architecture Diagrams

Veli-Pekka Eloranta, Essi Isohanni, Samuel Lahtinen, Outi Sievi-Korte

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Software architecture design is key to building systems that meet quality demands. Choosing the appropriate way to model the architecture ensures it is rightly understood by everyone involved. UML diagrams are commonly used in software engineering but free-form diagrams are almost as common. In this paper, we study the factors influencing the approachability of diagrams, and particularly whether there is a difference in the approachability between UML and non-UML diagrams and colored and black & white di- agrams. Our results show that colors do not necessarily increase the approachability of diagrams and free-form di- agrams can suffer from ambiguousness. We conclude that simplicity and correctness are key factors when modeling architectures.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASWEC 2015 24th Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC ' 15 Vol. II)
    Place of PublicationNew York, NY, USA
    PublisherACM
    Pages101-105
    Number of pages5
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4503-3796-0
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015
    Publication typeA4 Article in conference proceedings
    EventAustralasian Software Engineering Conference -
    Duration: 1 Jan 1900 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceAustralasian Software Engineering Conference
    Period1/01/00 → …

    Publication forum classification

    • Publication forum level 1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To UML or not to UML? – Empirical Study on the Approachability of Software Architecture Diagrams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this